Chris Behrens writes:
> I'm noticing that core reviewers aren't tagged as a +2 anymore in the
> general review box. Instead, it just shows a check. (Except for my
> own reviews, which show as a +2). I have to look at the review
> comments to see if others voted +2 now.
A check mark is equival
I'm noticing that core reviewers aren't tagged as a +2 anymore in the general
review box. Instead, it just shows a check. (Except for my own reviews, which
show as a +2). I have to look at the review comments to see if others voted
+2 now.
- Chris
On Apr 12, 2012, at 4:23 PM, James E. Blai
Thanks James and team for the work here, this will be very useful for
documentation drafts.
Anne
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Sandy Walsh wrote:
> Sounds awesome! Looking forward to Draft Changes, much needed.
>
> -S
>
>
>
> From:
> openstack-bounces
On 04/13/2012 04:36 AM, Kiall Mac Innes wrote:
> The new gerrit version also supports per user namespaces, if enabled.
>
> These allow users to create private branches with full push privileges etc..
>
> Have these been enabled?
They have not - we need to verify what the behavior looks like ov
> We've just upgraded Gerrit to version 2.3. There are a lot of
> changes
> behind the scenes that we've been looking forward to (like being able
> to
> store data in innodb rather than myisam tables for extra data
> longevity). And there are a few visible changes that may be of
> interest
> to
Sounds awesome! Looking forward to Draft Changes, much needed.
-S
From: openstack-bounces+sandy.walsh=rackspace@lists.launchpad.net
[openstack-bounces+sandy.walsh=rackspace@lists.launchpad.net] on behalf of
James E. Blair [cor...@inaugust.com]
S
The new gerrit version also supports per user namespaces, if enabled.
These allow users to create private branches with full push privileges etc..
Have these been enabled?
Thanks,
Kiall
Sent from my phone.
On Apr 13, 2012 12:33 p.m., "Thierry Carrez" wrote:
> Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> >> One n
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>> One new addition in 2.3 is "draft changes". The idea behind a draft
>> change in Gerrit is that it is a change that is not ready for merging,
>> or even general code review, but you would like to share it with some
>> people to get early comments. If you upload a change
Hey,
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 16:23 -0700, James E. Blair wrote:
> One new addition in 2.3 is "draft changes". The idea behind a draft
> change in Gerrit is that it is a change that is not ready for merging,
> or even general code review, but you would like to share it with some
> people to get ear
9 matches
Mail list logo
