Re: [Openstack] Devstack (sh) and tmux

2012-02-09 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > Option is best. I find both scenarios useful depending on what I'm working > on. > It seems that for everybody tmux and other shell support is not as important, I'll send a patch removing that support. Chmouel. _

Re: [Openstack] Devstack (sh) and tmux

2012-02-08 Thread Johannes Erdfelt
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012, Dugger, Donald D wrote: > Unless they've changed things (I've worked on so many versions of > Linux/Unix I do get confused :) but `stdio' is supposed to check and, > if the output is a file then it's buffered and, if it's a terminal, > then it's unbuffered. Hi Don! I'm pret

Re: [Openstack] Devstack (sh) and tmux

2012-02-08 Thread Joshua Harlow
output buffers. -- Don Dugger "Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale Ph: 303/443-3786 From: openstack-bounces+donald.d.dugger=intel@lists.launchpad.net [mailto:openstack-bounces+donald.d.dugger=intel@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of Ghe Rivero Sent: Wednesday, F

Re: [Openstack] Devstack (sh) and tmux

2012-02-08 Thread Dugger, Donald D
n Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale Ph: 303/443-3786 From: Joshua Harlow [mailto:harlo...@yahoo-inc.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 1:16 PM To: Dugger, Donald D; Ghe Rivero Cc: openstack Subject: Re: [Openstack] Devstack (sh) and tmux Doesn't stdout have a buffer also ;) I'

Re: [Openstack] Devstack (sh) and tmux

2012-02-08 Thread Joshua Harlow
a esse decisse." - D. Gale Ph: 303/443-3786 From: openstack-bounces+donald.d.dugger=intel@lists.launchpad.net [mailto:openstack-bounces+donald.d.dugger=intel@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of Ghe Rivero Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 11:54 AM To: Joshua Harlow Cc: openstack Subject: Re:

Re: [Openstack] Devstack (sh) and tmux

2012-02-08 Thread Dugger, Donald D
stack-bounces+donald.d.dugger=intel@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of Ghe Rivero Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 11:54 AM To: Joshua Harlow Cc: openstack Subject: Re: [Openstack] Devstack (sh) and tmux I like the idea of demonize it. Everyone using devstack should be able to open a terminal and

Re: [Openstack] Devstack (sh) and tmux

2012-02-08 Thread Jay Pipes
On 02/08/2012 01:54 PM, Ghe Rivero wrote: I like the idea of demonize it. Everyone using devstack should be able to open a terminal and use tail in the logs to see what's going on. Or maybe an option can be added to devstack to choose daemon vs. screen . Option is best. I find both scenarios us

Re: [Openstack] Devstack (sh) and tmux

2012-02-08 Thread Joshua Harlow
Try https://github.com/yahoo/Openstack-DevstackPy/wiki/Simple-Setup It might not be 100% with devstack (at least the quantum/melange/swift parts, to be tested better) but horizon, nova, glance, keystone, rabbit, mysql, should be the same (or with little difference). For those that want to check

Re: [Openstack] Devstack (sh) and tmux

2012-02-08 Thread Ghe Rivero
I like the idea of demonize it. Everyone using devstack should be able to open a terminal and use tail in the logs to see what's going on. Or maybe an option can be added to devstack to choose daemon vs. screen . BTW I use tmux+bash Ghe Rivero On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:

Re: [Openstack] Devstack (sh) and tmux

2012-02-08 Thread Joshua Harlow
Why not just daemonize the processes ;) This is pretty much what I am doing in devstackpy and it seems to work pretty well. I think people are pretty familiar with PID files, and files which contain stderr/stout as this is how a lot of other unix stuff runs. On 2/8/12 9:45 AM, "Jesse Andrews" w

Re: [Openstack] Devstack (sh) and tmux

2012-02-08 Thread Jesse Andrews
the reason for adding tmux is that we were running into issues with services not launching inside screen (due to a timing issue). I'm for removing tmux - since the sleep between creating a screen & using it has resolved the issue. Jesse On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 02/0

Re: [Openstack] Devstack (sh) and tmux

2012-02-08 Thread Jay Pipes
On 02/08/2012 11:44 AM, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: Hi, As mentioned in bug #928967[1] tmux support in devstack is not working and I was wondering if there was much people using it and if I should fix it. The advantage of tmux support is aside of being arguably a better terminal wm it allows support