Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift3 Github pages

2012-05-22 Thread Thierry Carrez
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Oleg Gelbukh wrote: >> We have a feature for swift3 middleware that we'd like to propose for merge. >> How we can do this now, when it is split into associated project? How has >> the procedure changed? > > I would expect this is going t

Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift3 Github pages

2012-05-22 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Oleg Gelbukh wrote: > We have a feature for swift3 middleware that we'd like to propose for merge. > How we can do this now, when it is split into associated project? How has > the procedure changed? I would expect this is going to be a typical Github (i.e: pull

Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift3 Github pages

2012-05-22 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:55 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > Thanks, before pulling the request, I would like to discuss the usage > of github pages and wiki. Which do we want? Or both? I think we should favour as much possible RST documentation to follow what we have in core swift. The github page

Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift3 Github pages

2012-05-21 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
Hello, On Tue, 22 May 2012 00:33:50 +0400 Oleg Gelbukh wrote: > We have a feature for swift3 middleware that we'd like to propose for > merge. Nice. > How we can do this now, when it is split into associated project? > How has the procedure changed? I'm not sure that there is official procedu

Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift3 Github pages

2012-05-21 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
Hi, On Mon, 21 May 2012 18:01:04 +0200 Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > I sent you a documentation pull req that should generate the sphinx > doc, It would be nice to generate some static html page of the > documentation as what Greg has done for his projects for example : > > http://gholt.github.co

Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Swift3 Github pages

2012-05-21 Thread Oleg Gelbukh
Gentlemen, We have a feature for swift3 middleware that we'd like to propose for merge. How we can do this now, when it is split into associated project? How has the procedure changed? -- Best reagards, Oleg Gelbukh Mirantis Inc. On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: > Hello