On Mar 1, 2012, at 5:21 AM, Soren Hansen wrote:
> 2012/2/28 Vishvananda Ishaya :
>> There is always progress to be made, but while we are toiling away working
>> on testing, technical debt, and code smell, we have to keep our users in
>> mind.
>
> This part of your e-mail really sticks out, alon
2012/2/28 Vishvananda Ishaya :
> There is always progress to be made, but while we are toiling away working
> on testing, technical debt, and code smell, we have to keep our users in
> mind.
This part of your e-mail really sticks out, along with this one:
> I disagree with this point. There was a
Hello everyone,
Sorry I didn't respond to this earlier. I have been extremely busy trying to
tie things up for e-4 so that we can start producing and testing release
candidates for essex. Soren, you make some excellent points that we should
address regardless of the results of the election. M
2012/2/24 Eric Windisch :
> On Friday, February 24, 2012 at 12:01 PM, ed_con...@dell.com wrote:
>
>> That can work and may be the only choice if there is an extended feature
>> freeze. Although, that may end up creating a service provider-specific
>> fork...which may not be a bad thing.
> It can al
On Friday, February 24, 2012 at 12:01 PM, ed_con...@dell.com wrote:
> That can work and may be the only choice if there is an extended feature
> freeze. Although, that may end up creating a service provider-specific
> fork...which may not be a bad thing.
It can also be a very, very bad thing. S
On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 09:35 -0600, ed_con...@dell.com wrote:
> I like the way you have put out your positions in public so everyone
> can understand your viewpoint. It would be good to see more of this
> from other PTL nominees.
Some of them have added their 'platform' to their names on
http://et
2012/2/24 :
> That can work and may be the only choice if there is an extended feature
> freeze. Although, that may end up creating a service provider-specific
> fork...which may not be a bad thing.
That's certainly not my intent nor desire. At least not permanently. I'd
love to have a chat about
, February 24, 2012 10:58 AM
To: Conzel, Ed
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Running for Nova PTL
2012/2/24 :
> I like most of what you say, but the ""no new features at all" policy
> for trunk for the Folsom" causes concern. I absolutely agree tha
2012/2/24 :
> I like most of what you say, but the ""no new features at all" policy
> for trunk for the Folsom" causes concern. I absolutely agree that Nova
> needs to be more stable, predictable and have more work done around
> operations. This is especially true for service provider usage. I
>
s+ed_conzel=dell@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-bounces+ed_conzel=dell@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of
Soren Hansen
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2012 6:08 AM
To: Jesse Andrews
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Running for Nova PTL
2012/2/23 Jesse Andrews :
> I
2012/2/23 Jesse Andrews :
> I'd love to hear more specifics about what needs more focus. These
> issues are large and have been the major focus of the core team for a
> while.
>> * Nova is too big.
>> Very few (if any) core developers are comfortable reviewing every
>> part of the code base.
2012/2/23 Duncan McGreggor :
> Soren, if elected, by what processes/policies etc. would you
> accomplish these goals?
Well, there are limits to what a PTL really can do :)
However, in practical terms there are a number of things I'd like us to
do:
* I'd like us to look at the various components
I'd love to hear more specifics about what needs more focus. These
issues are large and have been the major focus of the core team for a
while.
> * Nova is too big.
> Very few (if any) core developers are comfortable reviewing every
> part of the code base. In itself, this isn't necessarily
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Soren Hansen wrote:
> I've put my name on the ballot for Nova PTL, and I'd like to explain
> what I expect to do (my platform, if you will).
>
> Nova is facing many separate, but related problems.
>
> * Nova is too big.
> Very few (if any) core developers are com
I've put my name on the ballot for Nova PTL, and I'd like to explain
what I expect to do (my platform, if you will).
Nova is facing many separate, but related problems.
* Nova is too big.
Very few (if any) core developers are comfortable reviewing every
part of the code base. In itself, this
15 matches
Mail list logo
