CC'ing openstack-dev since that is a more appropriate list for this
discussion.
On 08/08/2012 04:35 PM, Eric Windisch wrote:
> I believe that the RPC backend should no longer have any default.
I disagree and my reason is fairly straight-forward. Changing the
default will break existing configura
>
>
> Regardless of the actual default in openstack-common, the devstack
> default is going to skew all of this as well (if not more so), and
> devstack does need a default. Much like db backend.
Devstack doesn't need a default, necessarily. Or more clearly, it doesn't need
to have a hard def
On 08/08/2012 05:00 PM, Andrew Clay Shafer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Eric Windisch mailto:e...@cloudscaling.com>> wrote:
I believe that the RPC backend should no longer have any default
Historically, it seems that the Kombu driver is default only because
it existed befo
Is there a good reason NOT to do this?
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Eric Windisch wrote:
> I believe that the RPC backend should no longer have any default.
>
>
>
> Historically, it seems that the Kombu driver is default only because it
> existed before all others and before there was an abs
I believe that the RPC backend should no longer have any default.
Historically, it seems that the Kombu driver is default only because it existed
before all others and before there was an abstraction. With multiple
implementations now available, it may be time for a change.
Why?
* A default s
5 matches
Mail list logo
