Avishay Traeger
>>> wrote:
>>> > openstack-bounces+avishay=il.ibm@lists.launchpad.net wrote on
>>> > 01/31/2013 12:37:07 AM:
>>> >> From: Tom Fifield
>>> >> To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net,
>>> >> Date: 01/31/20
@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] List of Cinder compatible devices
Hi John,
Sounds sensible. I think this post kind of diverged from what Tim was asking,
which seems to have been more about backend devices...?
Should this page be removed then, and a summary of what you wrote added to the
; wrote:
>>> > openstack-bounces+avishay=il.ibm@lists.launchpad.net wrote on
>>> > 01/31/2013 12:37:07 AM:
>>> >> From: Tom Fifield
>>> >> To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net,
>>> >> Date: 01/31/2013 12:38 AM
>>> >
> > 01/31/2013 12:37:07 AM:
>> >> From: Tom Fifield
>> >> To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net,
>> >> Date: 01/31/2013 12:38 AM
>> >> Subject: Re: [Openstack] List of Cinder compatible devices
>> >> Sent by: openstack-bounces+avishay=il.ibm...
> 01/31/2013 12:37:07 AM:
> >> From: Tom Fifield <mailto:fifie...@unimelb.edu.au>>
> >> To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> <mailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net>,
> >> Date: 01/31/2013 12:38 AM
> >>
013 at 11:20 AM, Avishay Traeger
> wrote:
> > openstack-bounces+avishay=il.ibm@lists.launchpad.net wrote on
> > 01/31/2013 12:37:07 AM:
> >> From: Tom Fifield
> >> To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net,
> >> Date: 01/31/2013 12:38 AM
> >> Subject
ists.launchpad.net,
>> Date: 01/31/2013 12:38 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Openstack] List of Cinder compatible devices
>> Sent by: openstack-bounces+avishay=il.ibm@lists.launchpad.net
>>
>> Here's a starting point:
>>
>> http://wiki.openstack.org/CinderS
openstack-bounces+avishay=il.ibm@lists.launchpad.net wrote on
01/31/2013 12:37:07 AM:
> From: Tom Fifield
> To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net,
> Date: 01/31/2013 12:38 AM
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] List of Cinder compatible devices
> Sent by: openstack-bounces
Here's a starting point:
http://wiki.openstack.org/CinderSupportMatrix
Regards,
Tom
On 31/01/13 09:00, Sébastien Han wrote:
> + RBD (Ceph)
>
> +1 for the matrix, this will be really nice :-)
> --
> Regards,
> Sébastien Han.
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
>>
>>
>> Is
+ RBD (Ceph)
+1 for the matrix, this will be really nice :-)
--
Regards,
Sébastien Han.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Tim Bell wrote:
>
>
> Is there a list of devices which are currently compatible with cinder and
> their relative functionality ?
>
>
>
> Looking through the source code, ther
Is there a list of devices which are currently compatible with cinder and
their relative functionality ?
Looking through the source code, there are EMC, IBM, NetApp, Nexenta but it
is not clear which models are supported or if there are other products also.
A functionality matrix (like t
11 matches
Mail list logo