On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Ziad Sawalha
wrote:
> Hi Paul - thank you for the good feedback.
>
> I'm going to address your points individually below, but before I want to
> to set some context and address some of your broader concerns.
>
> The 2.0 API for Keystone is released and multiple imp
Hi Paul - thank you for the good feedback.
I'm going to address your points individually below, but before I want to
to set some context and address some of your broader concerns.
The 2.0 API for Keystone is released and multiple implementers are already
working on it (in fact, we at Rackspace ha
Hello Y'all,
I'm writing the list with some of my thoughts as an user of the
Keystone 2.0 API.
Generally, I believe the API is too complicated, has too many 'hacks'
for backwards compatibility put into the wrong places, and pushes too
much logic into consumers and service implementers.
My experi
3 matches
Mail list logo
