On 20/05/13 07:51, Heinonen, Johanna (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote:
Hi,
I have installed grizzly with quantum and ovs-plugin. It seems that
grizzly allocates the third address of each subnet for dhcp. (In folsom
it was the second address). This means that the VMs will get addresses
This sound alot lik
Hi,
Unfortunately i was bussy with some other topics regarding the current
project im involved in, but I'm still trying to solve this issue.
A shot status update regarding dnsmasq issues we discovered:
-dnsmasq developers don't see the possibility that the behaviour we are
experiencing is caused
Hi Thomas,
any good news from dnsmasq dev?
Thanks
2013/5/23 Thomas Kärgel
> Hi,
>
> thank you very much, Marco. I posted your logs on dnsmasq-mailing-list
> and will report back when i receive an answer.
>
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
> Am 23.05.2013 15:06, schrieb Marco Colombo:
> > Hi Thomas,
>
Hi,
thank you very much, Marco. I posted your logs on dnsmasq-mailing-list
and will report back when i receive an answer.
Best regards
Thomas
Am 23.05.2013 15:06, schrieb Marco Colombo:
> Hi Thomas,
> here you can find some logs required by dnsmasq devs.
>
> http://paste.openstack.org/show/3766
Hi Thomas,
here you can find some logs required by dnsmasq devs.
http://paste.openstack.org/show/37668/
For this answer, "Maybe release a DHCP lease on an old host, and then see
if it can get a lease back again?" :
When the problem appears, the VM can't get lease back.
Should you have any furthe
Hi,
can somebody help to gather the desired informations? Since I'm not
able to reproduce our problem i cannot answer Simons questions:
>> The above mechanism is working fine in most cases. But lately there were
>> a few reports (4 afaik) that this mechanism is not working entirely
>> reliable.
> fixes the problem.
>> > > If you try the newer version of the qnsmasq, I'd be
>> interested to
>> > hear the results.
>> > >
>> > > BR
>> > > Johanna
>> > >
>> >
on of the qnsmasq, I'd be
> interested to
> > hear the results.
> > >
> > > BR
> > > Johanna
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> &g
> > fixes the problem.
> > > If you try the newer version of the qnsmasq, I'd be interested to
> > hear the results.
> > >
> > > BR
> > > Johanna
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > Johanna
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: ext Thomas Kärgel [mailto:kaer...@b1-systems.de
> <mailto:kaer...@b1-systems.de>]
> > Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 11:37 AM
> > To: Heinonen, Jo
nsmasq, I'd be interested to hear
> the results.
> >
> > BR
> > Johanna
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: ext Thomas Kärgel [mailto:kaer...@b1-systems.de]
> > Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 11:37 AM
> > To: Heinonen, Johan
ults.
>
> BR
> Johanna
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ext Thomas Kärgel [mailto:kaer...@b1-systems.de]
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 11:37 AM
> To: Heinonen, Johanna (NSN - FI/Espoo)
> Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] DHCP
'ip address'
from the main namespace and the dhcp namespace.
>
> From: "Heinonen, Johanna (NSN - FI/Espoo)"
>To: "openstack@lists.launchpad.net"
>Sent: Monday, 20 May 2013, 7:51
>Subject: [Openstack] DHCP problem i
ts.
BR
Johanna
-Original Message-
From: ext Thomas Kärgel [mailto:kaer...@b1-systems.de]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 11:37 AM
To: Heinonen, Johanna (NSN - FI/Espoo)
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] DHCP problem in grizzly
Hi,
thx for the interesting info, Johanna: dnsmasq
ersion is 2.59
>
> BR
> Johanna
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Openstack
> [mailto:openstack-bounces+johanna.heinonen=nsn@lists.launchpad.net] On
> Behalf Of ext Thomas Kärgel
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 10:09 AM
> To: openstack@lists.launchpad
Subject: Re: [Openstack] DHCP problem in grizzly
Hi Johanna,
I'm facing the same behavior on a Folsom-installation on SLES11SP2. I
noticed that new hosts have correct entries in the dnsmasq config-files.
The dnsmasq processes get a HUP signal by DHCP-Agent, but simply refuse
to deliver th
Hi Johanna,
I'm facing the same behavior on a Folsom-installation on SLES11SP2. I
noticed that new hosts have correct entries in the dnsmasq config-files.
The dnsmasq processes get a HUP signal by DHCP-Agent, but simply refuse
to deliver the new address. Instead dnsmasq logs claim "no address
avai
Hi,
I have installed grizzly with quantum and ovs-plugin. It seems that grizzly
allocates the third address of each subnet for dhcp. (In folsom it was the
second address). This means that the VMs will get addresses .2, .4, .5, ...
In my setup the first VM always boots fine and gets the address
18 matches
Mail list logo
