"Openstack" ,
m@lists.launchpad Subject
.net> Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Storage
Server Redirection
lists.launchpad.net"
,
Openstack
Subject
RE: [Openstack] [Swift] Storage
E
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Storage Server Redirection
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Luse, Paul E wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> I'd ask that Edward may want to chime in on object variation as I may not
> understand that one correctly - again I&#x
y server,
specifically in a form of the object server controllers would be a
good place for this kind of thing.
>
> Thanks
> Paul
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Portante [mailto:peter.a.porta...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 3:50 AM
> To: Luse
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 3:50 AM
To: Luse, Paul E
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Storage Server Redirection
Hi Paul,
Can you explain more about the two use cases referenced?
Object Variation seems like a nice idea, but can you clarify how the m
Thanks for the response John, see below...
Thx
Paul
-Original Message-
From: John Dickinson [mailto:m...@not.mn]
Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2013 11:29 PM
To: Luse, Paul E
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Storage Server Redirection
On May 31, 2013, at 4:53
nt: Monday, June 03, 2013 3:41 AM
To: Hua ZZ Zhang
Cc: Luse, Paul E; Openstack; openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Storage Server Redirection
Hi Paul,
I would like to echo Hua's and John's concern about 5xx code uses.
Using 3xx codes should be fine. Can y
Hi Paul,
Can you explain more about the two use cases referenced?
Object Variation seems like a nice idea, but can you clarify how the
mechanism would work to get at the variations? Any examples? From the
current descriptions, it seems like the LFS Patch could help here
without adding anything to
t Lab
> e-mail: zhu...@cn.ibm.com
>
>
> "Luse, Paul E" ---2013-06-01 上午 07:53:21---"Luse, Paul E"
>
>
> "Luse, Paul E"
> Sent by: "Openstack"
>
>
> 2013-06-01 上午 07:53
>
>
> To
>
> "openstack@lists.launchpad.net&q
>> 2) The basic idea is that an object server (via middleware or otherwise)
will be given the ability to respond to a request to indicate ‘not me but I
know who should handle this’. I’m thinking this makes more sense as a 5xx
response with additional information (partition, nodes) about the route
On May 31, 2013, at 4:53 PM, "Luse, Paul E" wrote:
> I’m looking at tacking this item:
>
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/swift/+spec/support-storage-server-redirects
>
> and wanted to get some feedback on the following observations/thoughts:
>
> 1) This is a capability that would be che
I'm looking at tacking this item:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/swift/+spec/support-storage-server-redirects
and wanted to get some feedback on the following observations/thoughts:
1) This is a capability that would be checked in independent of other
blueprints that might use it (2 are menti
12 matches
Mail list logo
