Re: [Openstack] [OpenStack] Limiting new roles

2012-10-31 Thread Gabriel Hurley
do Cc: openstack Subject: Re: [Openstack] [OpenStack] Limiting new roles I'm specifically referring to keystone, because you mention "...this role only can create tentants and roles..." If you can create tenants and roles in keystone, you also have the power to create new user

Re: [Openstack] [OpenStack] Limiting new roles

2012-10-31 Thread Dolph Mathews
I'm specifically referring to keystone, because you mention "...this role only can create tentants and roles..." If you can create tenants and roles in keystone, you also have the power to create new users and grant yourself additional roles in keystone, due to the binary nature of the policy impl

Re: [Openstack] [OpenStack] Limiting new roles

2012-10-31 Thread Dolph Mathews
With regard to keystone, the current policy implementation is entirely binary in that a role may either have total control over keystone or none. The implementation in Grizzly is much more granular. -Dolph On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Guillermo Alvarado < guillermoalvarad...@gmail.com> wrote

[Openstack] [OpenStack] Limiting new roles

2012-10-31 Thread Guillermo Alvarado
Hi everyboy, I want to create a new role, named "another-admin", so this role only can create tentants and roles but cannnot change quotas or modify images and all other actions that admin role can do. I read about create rules in the policy.json of each service (nova, keystone, glance, swift) b