Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Cannot create container.

2012-02-24 Thread Stephen Broeker
Why not 4 zones? On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Leander Bessa wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to set up a custom swift server in a virtual machine. I have > based my install on the SAIO configurations but i'm using repository > packages instead of the cloning from git. > > I'm using three parti

Re: [Openstack] [Swift]Swift Client Synchronization

2012-02-10 Thread Stephen Broeker
Looks like you want to mount your Swift Account as a UFS like file system. This is called Gateway. Folks typically use Fuse to do this. Check out s3fs. On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Hieu Le wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm starting to study about openstack cloud and it is very great to learn

Re: [Openstack] Creating account and user in swift

2012-01-27 Thread Stephen Broeker
The documentation seems to say that the user "system_tester" does not have auto permissions on its account. The headers X-Container-Read and/or X-Container-Write have to be set. The question is, how can a reseller_admin user see other accounts? A .reseller_admin account can touch all accounts. A .a

Re: [Openstack] Creating account and user in swift

2012-01-27 Thread Stephen Broeker
Are you using the "swift" utility or are you using REST? How are you performing the GET Authorization? On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Khaled Ben Bahri wrote: > Hi, > > I added an entry like this one but it doesn't work > I got this error > Account HEAD failed: https://x.x.x.x:8080/v1/AUTH_syst

Re: [Openstack] Creating account and user in swift

2012-01-27 Thread Stephen Broeker
Try adding an entry like the following: user_test_tester3 = testing3 On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Khaled Ben Bahri wrote: > Hi folks, > > I installed swift with "tempauth" authentication subsystem > To create a user I have to write a new line in the proxy-server.conf on > the section

Re: [Openstack] Swift Consistency Guarantees?

2012-01-20 Thread Stephen Broeker
replica is up. Will GET fail or return the old replica? > > Best, > Niko > > On 01/20/2012 02:52 PM, Stephen Broeker wrote: > > By default there are 3 replicas. > > A PUT Object will return after 2 replicas are done. > > So if all nodes are up then there are at leas

Re: [Openstack] Swift Consistency Guarantees?

2012-01-20 Thread Stephen Broeker
ct update has not yet been replicated on all nodes, and all > nodes that have been updated are offline, what will happen? Will swift > recognize this and give me an error, or will it silently return the > older version? > > Thanks, > Nikolaus > > > On 01/20/2012 02:14 PM,

Re: [Openstack] Swift Consistency Guarantees?

2012-01-20 Thread Stephen Broeker
If a node is down, then it is ignored. That is the whole point about 3 replicas. On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > Hi, > > What happens if one of the nodes is down? Especially if that node holds > the newest copy? > > Thanks, > Nikolaus > > On 0

Re: [Openstack] Swift Consistency Guarantees?

2012-01-20 Thread Stephen Broeker
The X-Newest header can be used by a GET Operation to ensure that all of the Storage Nodes (3 by default) are queried for the latest copy of the Object. The COPY Object operation already has this functionality. On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > Hi, > > No one able to furthe

Re: [Openstack] swift object versions

2012-01-12 Thread Stephen Broeker
I like that you are working on this great feature. In S3, Object Versioning is enabled/disabled per Container. You did not mention such functionality. On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 1:42 PM, John Dickinson wrote: > I've recently started working on adding versioning to objects stored in > swift (https:/