Re: [Openstack] Removing support for KVM Hypervisor ...

Hi Sandy It's not enough Let's make OpenStack to CloseStack! Nachi 2012/8/10 Sandy Walsh : > haha ... oh no. > > It's joke. Long story. > > Not going to happen :) > > From: chaohua wang [chwang...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 5:31 PM > To: Sandy Wal

[Openstack] [Quantum] Update policy of device_id

Hi folks I report this bug recently. device_id should not be updated twice https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bug/1031473 Now, a user can update device_id which may cause problem. This is related to port id spec for nova boot. https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1031096 My question is how w

[Openstack] [Quantum] Multi-host implementation

Hi folks > Gary Thank you for your comment. I wanna discuss your point on the mailing list. Yusuke pushed Multi-host implementation for review. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10766/2 This patch changes only quantum-dhcp-agent side. Gary's point is we should have host attribute on the port for

Re: [Openstack] [Quantum][Nova] requested_id and port spec

> > Vish > > On Jul 31, 2012, at 12:30 AM, Nati Ueno wrote: > >> Hi Dan >> >>>>> Matt >>>> Thank you for your comment in launchpad >>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1031096 >>>> >>>> >>>> Qu

Re: [Openstack] [Quantum][Nova] requested_id and port spec

Hi Dan >> > Matt >> Thank you for your comment in launchpad >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1031096 >> >> >> Quantum team get consensus in a Netstack meeting today to propose >> port-id for requested networks. I took the job. >> At first, i thought i can write extension for this. But as y

[Openstack] [Quantum][Nova] requested_id and port spec

Hi Matt, Yong, Dan and folks > Matt Thank you for your comment in launchpad https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1031096 Quantum team get consensus in a Netstack meeting today to propose port-id for requested networks. I took the job. At first, i thought i can write extension for this. But as y

Re: [Openstack] stable/diablo issue

Thanks Jim! I got it. Cheers Nati 2011/11/2 James E. Blair : > Nati Ueno writes: > >> Hi folks >> >> stable/diablo  nova didn't pass pep8 now. >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/885540 >> >> - Can we have pep8 check automatically for diab

[Openstack] stable/diablo issue

Hi folks stable/diablo nova didn't pass pep8 now. https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/885540 - Can we have pep8 check automatically for diablo/stable? - How about unit-testing on merge props for diablo/stable? - Can we have Jenkins task for diablo/stable ? Cheers Nati

Re: [Openstack] +1, All services should have WADLs

Hi Mark This is cool! Could you apply this for OpenStack WADL? Could you generate parameter list from XSD with XSLT? 2011/10/27 Mark Nottingham : > Example output at: >  http://mnot.github.com/wadl_stylesheets/ > > Cheers, > > > On 28/10/2011, at 9:55 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > >> FWIW, a long

Re: [Openstack] describing APIs for OpenStack consumers

Hi folks I tried to generate WADL from nova code. I could get all resource URI and method from Routes object. However, I could not get input parameters from code. (The api method accesses body argument directly. This is also bad for input validation QA effort.) But If we use some annotations, it

Re: [Openstack] describing APIs for OpenStack consumers

the >>> current state of the code. There's value in that, but i know it will cause >>> problems for anyone trying to rely and code to the spec (which I know we >>> are). >>> >>> Z >>> >>> >>> >>> On Oct 25, 201

Re: [Openstack] describing APIs for OpenStack consumers

Hi Joe 2011/10/25 Joseph Heck : > It sounds like even though most of us hate WADL, it's what we're expending > effort after to make a consolidated API set. So unless Nati and Ravi want to > switch to using Swagger (or something else), WADL is the direction we're > heading. I'm voting WADL for sur

Re: [Openstack] describing APIs for OpenStack consumers

Hi Folks > Daryl I know to read and write WADL is awful.. because I'm working on that. My main point is for clear specs. Current docs are very helpful, but it is not includes clear specs (parameter structures and types). >Jorge Sounds Great My review request is https://review.openstack.org/#chang

Re: [Openstack] describing APIs for OpenStack consumers

Hi Joe, Anne I'm working on WADL of Openstack Diablo in order to generate both of Test List and API docs from WADL. I wrote simple script which generate a simple api list from WADL. It is very helpful. Nova and Keystone has WADL, and Ravi@HP is working for glance. Nova's WADL is inconsistent wit

Re: [Openstack] Permission denied (publickey) by gerrit

Hi folks I discussed with Jeblair and Monty about this problem. The bug on launchpad cause this problem. https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/176031 Cheers Nati 2011/10/24 Nachi Ueno : > Hi folks > > I got permission denied from gerrit. Does Anyone know the solution? > > nova@nova-

Re: [Openstack] Announcing Nova subteams

Hi Vish,Jay > Jay Thank you for your FYI :) I would like to lead the Nova Testing Cleanup Team. As Jay mentioned, we are working on unit test writing and clean-ups. At first, we draft a blueprint for QA This is a policy of exception handling policy. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-qa/+

Re: [Openstack] [QA] openstack-integration-tests

for the stable branches.. > > -jay > > On Oct 12, 2011 4:13 PM, "Nati Ueno" wrote: >> >> Jim++ >> >> #I suppose the scope of openstack-qa-core and fixes are very similar. >> >> 2011/10/12 James E. Blair : >> > Gabe Westmaas writes:

Re: [Openstack] [QA] openstack-integration-tests

Jim++ #I suppose the scope of openstack-qa-core and fixes are very similar. 2011/10/12 James E. Blair : > Gabe Westmaas writes: > >> First, there was widespread agreement that in order for an integration >> suite to be run in the openstack jenkins, it should be included in the >> community githu

Re: [Openstack] [OpenStack QA] Sessions at the Design Summit

Hi Jay Thank you for your great recommendations! Cheers Nachi 2011/10/2 Jay Pipes : > Hi Stack QAers, > > There are quite a few folks interested in QA coming to the OpenStack > Essex Design Summit next week. I wanted to give you all a heads-up on > the sessions that may be of interest to you. > >

Re: [Openstack] Issues with Packaging and a Proposal

Monty++! Just FYI GridDynamics are working well for Packaging RPMs. http://wiki.openstack.org/NovaInstall/RHEL6Notes-Diablo-3 Its also works on Scientific Linux6.1 (Personally, I prefer free OS :D ) Here is there repos. http://yum.griddynamics.net/yum/diablo-3/openstack/ They maintains it on t