I have successfully configured openstack Grizzly setup.
While launching the dashboard I'm getting the following error in webpage,
+
Not Found
The requested URL / was not found on this server.
Apache Server at 10.1.52.161 Port 80
++
I want to receive cinder volume meters from ceilometer. What changes shall i
make in localrc file of devstack to acheive this?
I have already tried as describe in previous query
https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg24112.html
Thanks,
Anshul
___
Paul,
The blueprint of object-variation is able to allow an object to have
variant versions which are derived from the original master object. The
access to the master object can be smartly adapted or redirected to matched
version for different clients (web browser, mobile app, video player). On
You are probably running quantum commands as an admin user that's why you
got the error:
Multiple security_group matches found for name 'default', use an ID to be
more specific.
If you run quantum security-group-list
and then:
quantum security-group-rule-create --protocol icmp --direction ingres
Aaron,
Thanks for helping.
Actually I already have had this rule:
(quantum) security-group-rule-list
+--++---+--+--+--+
| id | security_group | direction | protocol
|
Paul,
I might misunderstand your blueprint here. it make sense to me if
redirection happens internally b/w proxy server and object server.
I have thought this redirection happens b/w client and proxy server, and a
new object URL will be sent to client.
Best Regards,
Hi Li,
If you can ping out to the internet from your second vm but not back in
it's most likely related to security groups.
I'd try running: quantum security-group-rule-create --protocol icmp
--direction ingress default
and see if that allows ping from the internet to be received.
Aaron
On Mo
I could also be very wrong here, but my impression was while most of
nova does work in that way, I believe cells is a special case and only
really supports rabbitmq right now...
Regards,
Tom
On 03/06/13 22:01, Endre Karlson wrote:
What I'm writing here might be uncorrect but here goes.
I
I found the fix so I can test this on my laptop
Ciao
Messaggio originale
Da: Remo Mattei
Data: 06/02/2013 23:16 (GMT-06:00)
A: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Oggetto: [Openstack] Mac parallels vm issues
Hi everyone I have the opportunities to test devstack on my Mac 16 g
What if we were to always do a release after a security advisory?
On 4 Jun 2013 06:25, "Jeremy Stanley" wrote:
> On 2013-06-03 10:51:19 -0700 (-0700), Lloyd Dewolf wrote:
> [...]
> > Interestingly, the OSSA 2013-014 notice did include
> > "python-keystoneclient fix (will be included in upcoming 0
On 2013-06-03 10:51:19 -0700 (-0700), Lloyd Dewolf wrote:
[...]
> Interestingly, the OSSA 2013-014 notice did include
> "python-keystoneclient fix (will be included in upcoming 0.2.4
> release)".
I'm going to chalk that up to Thierry knowing the version number at
that point, since the OSSA 2013-01
Hello,
I would appreciate if you help me to troubleshoot the following issue:
I am having error 403 intermittenly when listing containers in swift.
Sometimes the error appears a few times per hour, sometimes once per day.
Basically, it's possible to reproduce the error with a simple curl command:
On 2013-06-03 10:28 AM, George Mihaiescu wrote:
Try manually removing the route to 169.254.0.0 from inside the instance: route
del -net 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0
And then test again with "curl -m 10 -s
http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/public-keys/0/openssh-key";
curl could not connect to
Thanks Jeremy,
I agree with you. I prefer a follow up after the fact.
Interestingly, the OSSA 2013-014 notice did include
"python-keystoneclient fix (will be included in upcoming 0.2.4
release)".
Thank you,
Lloyd
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2013-06-03 10:01:03
On 2013-06-03 10:01:03 -0700 (-0700), Lloyd Dewolf wrote:
> I appreciate that it often isn't appropriate, but in this case it
> might have been beneficial to include python-keystoneclient
> version 0.2.4 where this is first resolved.
What's the better way to do that, do you think? Delay the
announ
Hi all,
I am having some issues with cloud-init being unable to contact the
metadata server. cloud-init built into a base Scientific Linux 6.4 image
with Oz. Any ideas on what might be the cause?
Starting cloud-init: ci-info: lo: 1 127.0.0.1 255.0.0.0 .
ci-info: eth0 : 1 10.0.100.
I appreciate that it often isn't appropriate, but in this case it
might have been beneficial to include python-keystoneclient version
0.2.4 where this is first resolved.
Thank you,
Lloyd
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> OpenStack Security Advisory: 2013-013
> CVE: CVE-20
Just a small update... the --version flag was broken in 0.2.4 [1], so 0.2.5
has now been released to pypi [2] specifically to fix this issue.
[1]: https://launchpad.net/python-keystoneclient/+milestone/0.2.5
[2]: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-keystoneclient/
-Dolph
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at
did you do iptables-save? if you want to save the rules and check them out do
iptables-save >nameofthefile.
That should do it.
Remo
On Jun 1, 2013, at 07:45 , Martin Mailand wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> if I add my routers gateway to an external network, I get an error in
> the l3-agent.log, abou
On 06/01/2013 10:45 AM, Martin Mailand wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> if I add my routers gateway to an external network, I get an error in
> the l3-agent.log, about a failure in iptables-restore.
> As far as I know iptables-restore gets the information on stdin, how
> could I see the iptable rules which d
Hi
Thx for such detailed response. I have approach at least three problems
with the migration.
1. Controller node (nova-api) is probably not able to speak with
nova-network and quantum simultaneously. Old instances loss their IPs (at
least in dashboard) which forces me to migrate all instances at
Hi Peter-
On the first point, note that all 3 of the features in question were submitted
by John as separate blueprints - I don't need to understand *all* of the
possible usages of the re-direct capability to implement it, it's a generic
'utility' capability that either of these other two bluep
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Luse, Paul E wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> I'd ask that Edward may want to chime in on object variation as I may not
> understand that one correctly - again I'm proposing to just implement the
> redirect response blueprint and reference object variation as a potential
>
Hi Peter,
I'd ask that Edward may want to chime in on object variation as I may not
understand that one correctly - again I'm proposing to just implement the
redirect response blueprint and reference object variation as a potential user
simply because John mentioned it in his original write-up
Thanks for the response John, see below...
Thx
Paul
-Original Message-
From: John Dickinson [mailto:m...@not.mn]
Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2013 11:29 PM
To: Luse, Paul E
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Swift] Storage Server Redirection
On May 31, 2013, at 4:53
So I'm not attached to 5xx as an error code, I was actually debating between
the two before sending this message out so have no argument for 5xx - I'll
gladly switch the plan to 3xx :)
Thanks
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Peter Portante [mailto:peter.a.porta...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday,
Hi Klaus,
How's the disk space usage now?
Cheers
+Hugo Kuo+
h...@swiftstack.com
tonyt...@gmail.com
+886 935004793
2013/5/31 Klaus Schürmann
> Hi,
>
> when I test my new swift cluster I get a strange behavior with GET and PUT
> requests.
> Most time it is really fast. But sometimes it takes a
What I'm writing here might be uncorrect but here goes.
I think the Qpid support is just to change the config parameter in
nova.conf to the class that has Qpid no?.
I think the "support" is handled in the different api classes and not at
the MQ transport library level.
Endre
2013/6/3 Lau Jay
Hi Paul,
Can you explain more about the two use cases referenced?
Object Variation seems like a nice idea, but can you clarify how the
mechanism would work to get at the variations? Any examples? From the
current descriptions, it seems like the LFS Patch could help here
without adding anything to
Hi Paul,
I would like to echo Hua's and John's concern about 5xx code uses.
Using 3xx codes should be fine. Can you give a sufficient argument to
consider 5xx?
Thanks,
-peter
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Hua ZZ Zhang wrote:
>>> 2) The basic idea is that an object server (via middleware or o
Hi Chris and Stackers,
I'm trying to do some evaluation on cell, does cell also support qpid? If
support, how to configure?
Thanks,
Jay
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://
>> 2) The basic idea is that an object server (via middleware or otherwise)
will be given the ability to respond to a request to indicate ‘not me but I
know who should handle this’. I’m thinking this makes more sense as a 5xx
response with additional information (partition, nodes) about the route
Hi all,
I set up an openstack recently. My first tenant's VMs' floating IP work fine.
All of them is pingable from "Internet".
However on second tenant, via GUI or CLI I can successfully assign floating IPs
to VMs, but they are not pingable. Meanwhile, I can ping Internet from VM's
private netw
Thanks Jerome for the clarification.
I just posted out a blogpost for adding a Second volume to Cinder in
Folsom [3]. Maybe it could be merged with the official Folsom Ubuntu
Cinder documentation ? There is only H/A aspects that are mentioned by now.
Someone from the documentation team ? Could
34 matches
Mail list logo
