increasing concurrency （with -c）should boost write performance.
发自我的 iPhone
在 2011-12-16，11:20，Rustam Aliyev 写道：
> Hi,
>
> I'm testing swift 1.4.4 setup with 4 nodes/zones on RHEL 5.7. I ran into the
> problem of slow writes. Using swift-bench we generated load, writing hundreds
> of 4K file
That's totally fine. The choice to go with python-keystoneclient was based
on a small sample of votes present at the time. I only asked in case
someone has an alternate, better suggestion - I would want to hear the
argument.
Z
On 12/16/11 7:35 PM, "Dolph Mathews" wrote:
>Me, not being aware tha
Please disregard. I've added a bug in launchpad and submitted a fix to gerrit.
Apologies for the newb email.
Thanks!
Maru
On 2011-12-16, at 7:24 PM, Maru Newby wrote:
> While following the saio instructions
> (http://swift.openstack.org/development_saio.html) I ran into a problem with
>
While following the saio instructions
(http://swift.openstack.org/development_saio.html) I ran into a problem with
the swift-core ppa. I get the following on apt-get update after adding the ppa
repo:
W: Failed to fetch
http://ppa.launchpad.net/swift-core/ppa/ubuntu/dists/lucid/main/binary-amd
Me, not being aware that we were already moving towards supporting
python-keystoneclient, implied that someone was /against/ python-keystoneclient.
I have no objections :)
-Dolph Mathews
On Dec 16, 2011, at 4:56 PM, Ziad Sawalha wrote:
> Who suggested not using python-keystoneclient?
>
>
>
Hi stef,
No bot there... just a human who introduced a copy/paste issue into the two
most recent HTML logs (I guess my algorithm of only checking the text logs
is faulty). Now fixed.
If someone has a bot that we can use to post the meeting logs, I'm all for
setting it up.
Dan
On Fri, Dec 16,
OpenStack Community Newsletter –December 16, 2011
HIGHLIGHTS
* Proposal to move non-standard ec2 “admin” api in essex
https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg06218.html
* Proposed branches for Essex-2 milestones have been cut
https://launchpad.net/openstack/+mileston
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Dong-In David Kang
> wrote:
> >> The server has either erred or is incapable of performing the
> >> requested operation. (HTTP 500)
> >
> > It was due to the version of webob.
> > The installed version was 1.2b.
> > After reverting it to 1.1.1, it works fine.
Folks, this is a very important topic. I tried to get ahold of the
person/people that manages the bots but I didn't succeed so far.
Today I noticed that Network team meeting logs are broken (only txt
summary and the full html logs give 404). See
http://wiki.openstack.org/Network/MeetingLogs
We ne
Who suggested not using python-keystoneclient?
On 12/16/11 4:12 PM, "Jesse Andrews" wrote:
>python-keystoneclient is based on python-novaclient, and is already in
>use by horizon as mentioned.
>
>What are the reasons for not using python-keystoneclient?
>
>Jesse
>
>On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:47
Joe,
I fully support your effort in creating a central reference page like the
one on your mock...and in fact I'm working with some of the doc tools
folks to help make that happen.
I think that the extension site contains different kind of docs for
different audience -- made up of implementors a
python-keystoneclient is based on python-novaclient, and is already in
use by horizon as mentioned.
What are the reasons for not using python-keystoneclient?
Jesse
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> Hrm. For some reason I thought we'd already decided to use the
> 4P/python-k
Inline:
-Original Message-
From: Anne Gentle
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 08:17:15 -0600
To: Jorge Williams
Cc: "openstack@lists.launchpad.net (openstack@lists.launchpad.net)"
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Extension Documentation
>Hi everyone -
>Overall I support this effort and have discussed it
Hrm. For some reason I thought we'd already decided to use the
4P/python-keystoneclient (it's been a todo list item for me to move it
in to the openstack repos) I take it that we have _not_ decided that we
should use that library as the keystone client library?
On 12/16/2011 10:16 AM, Dolph Math
Something I've found useful to help with the "cleanup" situation is the
following.
http://pastebin.com/Vm03EafN
It at least does some basic devstack cleanup then attempts to install a new
version from git (nothing special really) - ubuntu only...
Maybe others will find it useful...
On 12/16/1
On Dec 16, 2011, at 11:30 AM, Mark Washenberger wrote:
> "Johannes Erdfelt" said:
>
>> I'm not saying you need to do it, but this is something that doesn't
>> have an obvious design and implementation. It would be easier to
>> understand and discuss with some real meat behind it.
>
> From what
"Johannes Erdfelt" said:
> I'm not saying you need to do it, but this is something that doesn't> have an
> obvious design and implementation. It would be easier to> understand and
> discuss with some real meat behind it.
>From what Monsyne Dragon and Jonathan LaCour have said on this topic, I f
IMPORTANT: this is NOT about removing EC2 api or admin apis - it is
about moving admin extensions to openstack api extensions.
When we first created nova, we created a set of admin apis that helped
make the project configurable without nova-manage. We shoved them
into the ec2 api layer since the
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Dong-In David Kang wrote:
>> The server has either erred or is incapable of performing the
>> requested operation. (HTTP 500)
>
> It was due to the version of webob.
> The installed version was 1.2b.
> After reverting it to 1.1.1, it works fine.
Hmmm, could it b
On Fri, Dec 16 2011, Dan Wendlandt wrote:
> Apologies. Because Quantum is still in incubation, the tag is not created
> automatically and I forgot to do it manually after sending out the release
> email last night.
Thanks a lot Dan.
--
Julien Danjou
// eNovance http://enova
cc'ing mailing list as this is generally useful and something I myself
ran into last night when I grabbed the latest devstack and re-ran
stack.sh...
I found the solution was to remove all the old .pyc files, like so:
cd $GLANCE_SRC_DIR
find . -type f -name "*.pyc" -exec sudo rm -f {} \;
And then
Hi Julien,
Apologies. Because Quantum is still in incubation, the tag is not created
automatically and I forgot to do it manually after sending out the release
email last night.
essex-2 tag is now created: https://github.com/openstack/quantum/tags
Dan
p.s. thanks to Ghe for also pointing this o
>
>
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Dong-In David Kang
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm trying to make novaclient work with keystone.
> > > It looks like authentication is working, but actual interaction
> > > between novaclient and nova does not work.
> > > Here is what I get (with added debuggi
Thank you for your nice words!
Dual configuration is the most common configuration we use: you only need
to be cautious about how to configure the different networks. Just some
hints:
1) Leave the management network as simple as possible.
2) The service network (the one that connects all the virt
Well, I'm certainly not planning on writing a client from scratch, so I'd
be happy to hear some discussion on which client we should deem official
and replace the others with.
My only concern is that we provide an intuitive python API supporting the
various auth flows.
-Dolph
On Fri, Dec 16, 201
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, John Garbutt wrote:
> One use case is providing metadata to an instance before that instance
> starts their network stack. A bit of an edge case, but I guess one
> instance of this use case is the network injection logic used for Flat
> networking.
>
> Would injected files cov
Diego,
Just one word: fantastic!
I could install, configure, launch my first VM while sipping a coffee!
I can't wait to try the dial-nodes, do I need only a second switch?
Thanks so much for stackops, and thanks all for your quick answers!
alex
2011/12/16 Diego Parrilla Santamaría
> Hi Alex
Dolph Mathews wrote:
> Yes (and there's actually more than 2 floating around, in various
> states); we're moving towards providing a single client, independent of
> keystone, which can be consumed by other projects (including keystone
> itself).
>
> There's no milestone target for this effort yet,
On Fri, Dec 16 2011, Dolph Mathews wrote:
> Yes (and there's actually more than 2 floating around, in various states);
> we're moving towards providing a single client, independent of keystone,
> which can be consumed by other projects (including keystone itself).
>
> There's no milestone target f
Yes (and there's actually more than 2 floating around, in various states);
we're moving towards providing a single client, independent of keystone,
which can be consumed by other projects (including keystone itself).
There's no milestone target for this effort yet, but:
https://blueprints.launchpa
One use case is providing metadata to an instance before that instance starts
their network stack. A bit of an edge case, but I guess one instance of this
use case is the network injection logic used for Flat networking.
Would injected files cover the above case? Would it still work after the
p
Hi,
I've just a small question about Keystone client code.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that currently there's Keystone
client code inside python-novaclient as novaclient.keystone. OTOH,
horizon seems to use python-keystoneclient which is not part of
OpenStack.
I don't see the point to
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
>
> On Dec 15, 2011, at 10:37 AM, Scott Moser wrote:
>
> > What does a "Server Personality" give me that cannot be accomplished
> > accomplished by guest and lauching-entity agreeing on a key-value pair
> > with keyname "server-personality".
>
> I thi
Straight from github.com/openstack/keystone or from packaging? What was
missing?
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Leander Bessa wrote:
> Both ports are running a python process, which i suppose is keystone. That
> directory does not exist on my system. I installed all the packages from
> the off
Both ports are running a python process, which i suppose is keystone. That
directory does not exist on my system. I installed all the packages from
the official repository. Maybe something is outdated or misconfigured
because i already dealt with an issue where some python modules where
missing fro
The first command (templated version response) failing is non-critical (the
functional calls should still work), but it looks like keystone isn't
finding it's static content where expected.
Where is keystone actually located in your install? (not /usr/keystone/?)
Ping me on IRC (dolphm) if that's
Hi,
I've keystone at least running on Ubuntu 11.10 with the openstack sru
updates ppa [1]. Is the service running on your system? I'd check with
$ sudo netstat -ntaupe | grep 5000
and
$ sudo netstat -ntaupe | grep 35357
Both should be served by a keystone process.
Regards,
Torsten
[1] https://
Hello,
I've been trying to set up openstack with the keystone service. I'm using a
virtual machine with ubuntu 11.10 and installed openstack through the main
repository.
After configuring keystone with the example data, i try to run the commands
from http://keystone.openstack.org/adminAPI_curl_ex
Julien Danjou wrote:
> https://launchpad.net/quantum/essex/essex-2 says essex-2 for quantum is
> release, but I don't see any Git tags.
>
> Could someone correct that?
Quantum is still in incubation / manual release mode, which might
explain why it couldn't be tagged. I'll see with Dan so that th
Hi everyone,
At the end of a long day, I'm pleased to announce the immediate
availability of the second milestone of the Essex development cycle for
Keystone, Glance, Nova and Horizon. Note that Nova now provides
python-novaclient as an additional release deliverable.
You can see the full list of
Hi,
https://launchpad.net/quantum/essex/essex-2 says essex-2 for quantum is
release, but I don't see any Git tags.
Could someone correct that?
--
Julien Danjou
// eNovance http://enovance.com
// ✉ julien.dan...@enovance.com ☎ +33 1 49 70 99 81
Hi Alexandre,
you can build a simple SingleNode in Flat Network mode with our StackOps
Distro: http://www.stackops.org
Once you have installed and configured the Single Node, then you can go to
/etc/nova/nova-controller.conf and you can find the configuration details.
If you feel brave enough to
42 matches
Mail list logo
