All of these are correct. The other piece of that is that OpenVz is much
more mature and it's tooling is as well. That being said we aren't
tightly coupled to any one technology so when LXC appears to meet our
needs we can visit that at that time.
Daniel
On 4/24/11 5:25 PM, "Edward Konetzko" w
On 04/24/2011 10:16 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Daniel Morris wrote:
The initial architecture of this service is being designed around
several technologies listed below
· *Open Stack Compute (Nova) *
· *OpenVZ*- OpenVZ is a container based virtualization technology
that ensures guara
On 04/24/2011 08:27 PM, Soren Hansen wrote:
> There are still *big* projects that still use subversion or even CVS
> (e.g. OpenBSD) and manage to stay productive.
Yes right. So let's go back to use RCS, I'm sure you'll find some
projects still using it! :)
On 04/24/2011 08:27 PM, Soren Hansen wro
Daniel Morris wrote:
> The initial architecture of this service is being designed around
> several technologies listed below
>
> · *Open Stack Compute (Nova) *
>
> · *OpenVZ*- OpenVZ is a container based virtualization technology
> that ensures guaranteed resource minimums and maximum
2011/4/23 Thomas Goirand :
> On 04/22/2011 08:17 PM, Soren Hansen wrote:
>>> I wasn't discussing rebasing and hiding trials and errors or even
>>> rebasing, but cherry-picking things in a branch that we see fits,
>>> and are ready for a merge.
>> It may not be completely obvious on the surface, but
5 matches
Mail list logo
