Hi Jorge,
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 05:34:59PM -0500, Jorge Williams wrote:
>I'm not that familiar with WSGI but it looks like you're proposing
>something similar to what I have above.
>
>WSGI may indeed be the solution, but I would say, what should be split
>into a separate app sh
On Aug 3, 2010, at 9:06 AM, Michael Gundlach wrote:
Howdy Eric,
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Eric Day
mailto:e...@oddments.org>> wrote:
Hi Jorge,
I think we may not be on the same page here.
But I think we're getting close :) All three of us have slightly different
approaches in mind, but
Hey!
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 03:24:15PM -0400, Michael Gundlach wrote:
>Hooray again for WSGI solving this problem :) In-process transformations
>that can become HTTP proxies as needed!
I have a prototype of a layered WSGI app that talks AMQP (via
carrot module like in Nova) to Rabbit du
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Eric Day wrote:
> > 2. Jorge and I would suggest making the request chain longer when
> >possible to simplify each part, while you would suggest collapsing
> it
> >to reduce the number of hops.
>
> I suggest only making it longer when it is nece
Hi Michael,
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 10:06:02AM -0400, Michael Gundlach wrote:
>But I think we're getting close :) All three of us have slightly
>different approaches in mind, but we're narrowing down the areas where we
>disagree. I've tried listing our agreements and disagreements be
Howdy Eric,
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:57 PM, Eric Day wrote:
> Hi Jorge,
>
> I think we may not be on the same page here.
But I think we're getting close :) All three of us have slightly different
approaches in mind, but we're narrowing down the areas where we disagree.
I've tried listing our
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Jorge Williams wrote:
> Hmm.. Let me see if I understand what you're saying. Correct me if I'm
> wrong here. You're still advocating a proxy approach where an HTTP request
> is sent from one proxy to another... (Parton my txt drawings)
> *
> *
> ...but you are p
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Eric Day wrote:
> Hi Jorge, Michael,
>
> Yeah, this is pretty much what I had in mind. Beyond having services
> that get called out from APIs, the implementation within the projects
> should not be specific as well. For example, there should be a generic
> auth API
8 matches
Mail list logo
