add extension to an existing (signed) CA certificate

2009-08-24 Thread jehan procaccia
Hello, since Firefox 3.5 apparently doesn't accept Root CA self signed certificate which doesn't contain correct extensions (Basic Constraints: CA:TRUE) I wonder how I can add these extensions to my already existing and self signed Root CA : http://ca.institut-telecom.fr/pki/IT_MASTER_CA/itr

Re: add extension to an existing (signed) CA certificate

2009-08-26 Thread Jehan PROCACCIA
Le 25/08/2009 20:09, Patrick Patterson a écrit : The only way to add this extension to your root cert is to re-issue your Root CA certificate (you can use the same private keys, so you wouldn't have to change or re-do any of the other certificates in your trust chain, as long as your Certificate

Re: add extension to an existing (signed) CA certificate

2009-08-26 Thread Jehan PROCACCIA
Le 26/08/2009 12:17, Peter Sylvester a écrit : OK, then how do I re-issue my root CA certificate with my already existing ca.key ? If I could have a sample commande line for openssl it would help me . something like OPENSSL x509 -set_serial $SERIAL -clrext -extfile CA-EXTENSION.prm -days $D

Re: add extension to an existing (signed) CA certificate

2009-08-26 Thread jehan procaccia
On 08/26/2009 04:24 PM, Peter Sylvester wrote: Jehan PROCACCIA wrote: Le 26/08/2009 12:17, Peter Sylvester a écrit : OK, then how do I re-issue my root CA certificate with my already existing ca.key ? If I could have a sample commande line for openssl it would help me . something like

Re: add extension to an existing (signed) CA certificate

2009-08-27 Thread Jehan PROCACCIA
Le 26/08/2009 22:16, Patrick Patterson a écrit : Hi there: Ok, then in my case $PREFIX is it_root_ca.crt (PKI public cert) and $CAPREFIX it_root_ca.key (PKI private key) . but here's what I get : [pkiitr...@localhost ~/New_IT_ROOT_CA/pki/ca] $ openssl x509 -set_serial 01 -clrext -extfile

Re: add extension to an existing (signed) CA certificate

2009-08-28 Thread Jehan PROCACCIA
Le 28/08/2009 02:57, Patrick Patterson a écrit : Jehan PROCACCIA wrote: Le 26/08/2009 22:16, Patrick Patterson a écrit : Hi there: Ok, then in my case $PREFIX is it_root_ca.crt (PKI public cert) and $CAPREFIX it_root_ca.key (PKI private key) . but here's what

Re: add extension to an existing (signed) CA certificate

2009-08-31 Thread jehan procaccia
Jehan PROCACCIA a écrit : Le 28/08/2009 02:57, Patrick Patterson a écrit : Now I removed all my mozilla (firefox, seamonkey ) profiles on my test client that's what you mean by "replacing root CA certificate on your client " ? since I erased profiles (and hence stored

Re: add extension to an existing (signed) CA certificate

2009-09-01 Thread jehan procaccia
jehan procaccia a écrit : I finally found it ! [proca...@anaconda ~] $ openssl s_client -host svnext.it-sudparis.eu -port 443 -CAfile /etc/pki/tls/certs/new_it_root_ca10.crt -verify 3 verify depth is 3 CONNECTED(0003) depth=3 /CN=Institut TELECOM Root class1 Certificate Authority/O

Re: add extension to an existing (signed) CA certificate

2009-09-01 Thread jehan procaccia
lton a écrit : Never, ever, ever, ever, ever under any circumstances issue the same serial number twice. You tried to issue the same serial to both roots -- badbadbadbadbadDONOT. -Kyle H On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 8:56 AM, jehan procaccia wrote: jehan procaccia a écrit : I finally found i

Re: add extension to an existing (signed) CA certificate

2009-09-02 Thread jehan procaccia
Peter Sylvester a écrit : well, if one takes the standard configuration of openssl, it sets the authoritykey_identifier both the hash and issuer serial, no exception for the root. comment says that pkix recommends that. yes , and the thread you refered me on this list named "Bug in "authorityKe

standard process to validate a certificate chain ?

2009-09-04 Thread jehan procaccia
hello, in a recent thread on this list about "add extension to an existing (signed) CA certificate" I was wondering how openssl software validate a certificate chain. jehan procaccia wrote : Can someone tell me how SSL clients check/verify a 3 level hierarchie ? is it based on

Re: A PKI in a web page

2009-09-10 Thread jehan procaccia
Good initiative I'll give it a try ... although I am looking for "intermediate" size PKI free software, I am a bit confused with large scale software like openca or ejbca , too complex :-( I used to operate my pki with a perl-openssl package from http://devel.it.su.se/pub/jsp/polopoly.jsp?d=102

Re: A PKI in a web page

2009-09-11 Thread jehan procaccia
ar now and it was easy to modify it to accommodate my own requirements (like supporting SHA1 instead of the default MD5 and adding new templates). I hope it can be useful for you as it is for me. Cheers, -- Mounir IDRASSI IDRIX http://www.idrix.fr jehan procaccia wrote: Good initiative I'll

Re: A PKI in a web page

2009-09-14 Thread jehan procaccia
/users/leifj/ is where it can be found. You're using either 0.31 or 0.32, if you're using one with a date from 2005. -Kyle H On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 8:24 AM, jehan procaccia wrote: Actually I am looking for a simple software with command line interface to operate a CA, sub-CA then

Re: A PKI in a web page

2009-09-15 Thread Jehan PROCACCIA
Le 15/09/2009 09:37, Leif Johansson a écrit : On Monday 14 September 2009 16.17.26 jehan procaccia wrote: Indeed CSP is a version 0.34 since 2007, no updates since then ... but perhaps the project is mature and bug free, no evolution needed ? is there still someone behind it (leifj at

Re: A PKI in a web page

2009-09-15 Thread jehan procaccia
Leif Johansson a écrit : On Tuesday 15 September 2009 15.54.33 Jehan PROCACCIA wrote: Le 15/09/2009 09:37, Leif Johansson a écrit : On Monday 14 September 2009 16.17.26 jehan procaccia wrote: Indeed CSP is a version 0.34 since 2007, no updates since then ... but perhaps the

Re: add extension to an existing (signed) CA certificate

2009-09-20 Thread jehan procaccia
jehan procaccia a écrit : Peter Sylvester a écrit : well, if one takes the standard configuration of openssl, it sets the authoritykey_identifier both the hash and issuer serial, no exception for the root. comment says that pkix recommends that. yes , and the thread you refered me on this list