On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 6:59 AM, Michael Wojcik
wrote:
> All of these approaches have already been suggested in this thread. Is it
> really necessary that we go through them again?
>
>
What hasn't been suggested is giving each server, etc. its own sub-CA signed by
the root. Then there won't be a
Hello,
I am trying to patch the PKCS#7 code to (partially) handle CMS ver 3.
What I need is to parse a CMS structure that has an attribute
certificate in the certificates field of SignedData.
The relevant defintions from RFC 2630 are:
SignedData ::= SEQUENCE {
version CMSVersion,
Nikolay Elenkov wrote:
> I am trying to patch the PKCS#7 code to (partially) handle CMS ver 3.
> What I need is to parse a CMS structure that has an attribute
> certificate in the certificates field of SignedData.
>
...
>
> typedef struct certificate_choices_st {
>
