Re: [openssl-users] Getting the Subject name length as a string.

2004-10-07 Thread Erwann Abalea
Bonjour, On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is there any function available in the openssl that gives the length of > the entire subject-name as a string. Use X509_NAME_print_ex() with a memory BIO. > The function X509_NAME_oneline expects the buffer and its size. In this > case, we

Compiling openssl to Pocket PC 2003

2004-10-07 Thread Gilson Cavalcanti
    Hello all,       I’m trying to compile openssl for use it with a .NET C# solution for Pocket PC 2003 (Windows CE4.20). I’m using the MS eMbedded Visual C++ 4.0.     Anyone already, had success with something like this?   Gilson Cavalcanti Grupo TCI - Busine

Certificate fetching for bridge CA configuration

2004-10-07 Thread Charles B Cranston
So, this is perhaps the most simple "bridge" PKI arrangement: +-+---++-+---+ |T| ||T| | +-+---++-+---+ | P Root++

Re: Certificate fetching for bridge CA configuration

2004-10-07 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 07 Oct 2004 15:20:52 -0400, Charles B Cranston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: zben> So, this is perhaps the most simple "bridge" PKI arrangement: zben> zben> +-+---++-+---+ zben> |T| |

'ml' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'ml' : return code '0x1'

2004-10-07 Thread Peter O Sigurdson
Greetings, I'm trying to compile OpenSSL for Windows.  I am using openssl-0.9.7d Everything goes well until I get to the part about   nmake -f ms\ntdll.mak The error message is: 'ml' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file.   NMAKE : fatal error U1

RE: 'ml' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'ml' : return code '0x1'

2004-10-07 Thread David Schwartz
> I'm trying to compile OpenSSL for Windows. I am using openssl-0.9.7d > Everything goes well until I get to the part about nmake -f ms\ntdll.mak > The error message is: > 'ml' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. > NMAKE : fatal error U1077:

RE: 'ml' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'ml' : return code '0x1'

2004-10-07 Thread David Schwartz
Look at: http://msdn.microsoft.com/visualc/productinfo/faq/default.aspx "Where can I find MASM? In Visual C++ 6.0, Professional and Enterprise customers could get the Microsoft Assembler (MASM) by downloading VC++ 6.0 Processor Pack. Today MASM ships with Visual Studio .NET Professional

RE: 'ml' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'ml' : return code '0x1'

2004-10-07 Thread Layla
Hi Peter,   I had the same problem a few months ago, there are two ways to go about this: 1- Since "ml" is messing as its not part of the standard VC++6 (assuming that's what you're using) you need to install MS VC+6 Processor Pack. Note that this requires the installation of either service pack 4

Re: Compiling openssl to Pocket PC 2003

2004-10-07 Thread Ajay
i was able to compile for Pocket PC 2002 (WinCE 3.0) using embedded VC++ 3.0 and it works fine. the only problem was there wasn't a random source to seed the PRNG. to get around it, i used a .rnd file with random data. i dont know about using it with .NET C#. I used it with Python. cheers Quot

Re: Certificate fetching for bridge CA configuration

2004-10-07 Thread Charles Cranston
In an earlier version of the diagram I had one more level of certificate between the bridge certificates and the end-user certificates, but I was trying to make it simpler. If there is one more certificate between (Bridge)QSign and (QSign)End User it could be supplied by the Q offerer. The cost he

Re: Certificate fetching for bridge CA configuration

2004-10-07 Thread Kiyoshi Watanabe
Charles, One question: Are you talking about the NIST bridge CA concept or some other variants? It is too hard to understand the diagram. With my understanding, the bridge CA is a hub between different CA domains. Thus each root CA (or principal CA) issues a cross certificate to bridge. -Kiyosh