Ulf Moeller schrieb:
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2000, Ulf Moeller wrote:
>
> > OpenSSL is part of all major free operating systems and one or two commercial
> > ones. You can use it on those systems, thanks to a special clause in the
> > GPL. If you want to use it on any other systems, you'll have to c
Thank you for your answer !
But it leads to another question :-)
Do you know a reliable tools that permit to generate
a file containing actual randomn numbers on Windows NT ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bodo Moeller
Sent: vendredi 1
Hi,
On Oct. 30th 2000, Richard Levitte wrote:
mark> > cc -o openssl -DMONOLITH -I../include -O3 -DB_ENDIAN openssl.o
verify.o
mark> > asn1pars.o req.o dgst.o dh.o dhparam.o enc.o passwd.o gendh.o
errstr.o ca.o
mark> > pkcs7.o crl2p7.o crl.o rsa.o rsautl.o dsa.o dsaparam.o x509.o
genrsa.o
mark> >
Hi,
I compiled OpenSSL 0.9.6/mod_ssl-2.7.1-1.3.14/Apache 1.3.14
successfully (with one easy patch, which I posted just before),
under MacOS-X-Server, but when I try to start
Apache I get the following error-msg in my error-log file:
[Tue Nov 14 12:04:18 2000] [error] mod_ssl: Init: Failed to gen
IE. 56k browsers can not read our ssl (Global 128) websites (I wish we could
get rid of these buggy IE browsers). Searching the web I found that versions
of openssl 0.9.5a and higher have this problem. Has anyone ran into this or
heard of an opeenssl fix for this ?
DW
__
> IE. 56k browsers can not read our ssl (Global 128) websites (I wish we
> could
> get rid of these buggy IE browsers). Searching the web I found that
> versions
> of openssl 0.9.5a and higher have this problem. Has anyone ran into
> this or
> heard of an opeenssl fix for this ?
Although I am no
I totally agree since it seems to work fine on other server platforms and
worked prior to upgrading openssl. I also agree on the 128 upgrade, but
after purchasing 128 global certs with windows 2000 including the 56k bit
browser, this is a problem. Because 2000 windoze users are un-aware.
-Or
"Dave Stafford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > IE. 56k browsers can not read our ssl (Global 128) websites (I wish we
> > could
> > get rid of these buggy IE browsers). Searching the web I found that
> > versions
> > of openssl 0.9.5a and higher have this problem. Has anyone ran into
> > this or
I tried 0.9.6 and it didn't work either.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Rescorla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 9:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IE 56k errors
"Dave Stafford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > IE. 56k browsers can not read our ssl (
I have tried to install openssl-0.9.6 on Solaris
sparc with compiler cc. Here is the error I got:
--
cc -o openssl -DMONOLITH -I../include -DTHREADS -D_REENTRANT -xtarget=ultra
-xarch=v8plus -xO5 -xstrconst -xdepend -Xa -DB_ENDIAN -DBN_DIV2W -DULTRASPARC
-DMD5_ASM openssl.o verify
Ulf Moeller wrote:
> Also, if you're in doubt about what the GPL does or doesn't allow, you
> should get legal advise. The FSF clearly has its own ideological agenda.
The GPL neither permits nor forbids anything -- it is an untested
experiment, an abuse of copyright law, and would not withstan
Michael Sierchio wrote:
>
> Ulf Moeller wrote:
>
> > Also, if you're in doubt about what the GPL does or doesn't allow, you
> > should get legal advise. The FSF clearly has its own ideological agenda.
>
> The GPL neither permits nor forbids anything -- it is an untested
> experiment, an abuse
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000, Xiaohua Cheng wrote:
> cc -o openssl -DMONOLITH -I../include -DTHREADS -D_REENTRANT -xtarget=ultra
>-xarch=v8plus -xO5 -xstrconst -xdepend -Xa -DB_ENDIAN -DBN_DIV2W -DULTRASPARC
>-DMD5_ASM openssl.o verify.o asn1pars.o req.o dgst.o dh.o dhparam.o enc.o passwd.o
>gendh.o e
Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
> "Dave Stafford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > IE. 56k browsers can not read our ssl (Global 128) websites (I wish we
> > > could
> > > get rid of these buggy IE browsers). Searching the web I found that
> > > versions
> > > of openssl 0.9.5a and higher have this pr
David Walgamotte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I tried 0.9.6 and it didn't work either.
Interesting. I've never actually tested SGC with OpenSSL so
I don't know that it works :)
Did OpenSSL report any errors?
-Ekr
__
OpenSSL
Dr S N Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just to clarify a few points. The SGC support was added in OpenSSL
> 0.9.5. 56 bit ciphersuites were also enabled at that time.
My bad. Looks like I misread the CHANGES file. :(
-Ekr
__
Here is the "make output" output:
--
OpenSSL self-test report:
OpenSSL version: 0.9.6
Last change: In ssl23_get_client_hello, generate an error message wh...
Options: --prefix=/emc/s4/openssl --openssldir=/emc/s4/openssl/open
ssl
OS (uname): SunOS lo
17 matches
Mail list logo
