On 8/16/2013 1:51 PM, Ztatik Light wrote:
found yet another weird peculiarity...
In my full application, i need the following lines after both
encrypt_file() and decrypt_read(), otherwise i get garbage data:
char err[1024];
ERR_error_string( ERR_get_error(), err );
printf( "%s\n", err );
And e
Ø I have no idea wtf is up with all these bugs but i'm surprised openssl is
this glitchy
It is not. The problem is almost definitely in your code. It is also hard to
help when the code you post isn't the code you're trying to debug.
Get and run valgrind and see what it says. Compile with ma
found yet another weird peculiarity...
In my full application, i need the following lines after both
encrypt_file() and decrypt_read(), otherwise i get garbage data:
char err[1024];
ERR_error_string( ERR_get_error(), err );
printf( "%s\n", err );
And err is 0... but without those three lines the
Ø Seriously - if i just use des instead of des_ede3 in works. that simple. has
got to be a bug
Run your code through something like valgrind
--
Principal Security Engineer
Akamai Technology
Cambridge, MA
yes, i fixed that.. it's not causing the problem..
Seriously - if i just use des instead of des_ede3 in works. that simple.
has got to be a bug
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Salz, Rich wrote:
> **Ø **Some serious bug?
>
> ** **
>
> Yes, but in your code:
>
> **Ø **char new_filena
Ø Some serious bug?
Yes, but in your code:
Ø char new_filename[strlen( filename + 5 )];
char new_filename[strlen( filename) + 5];
--
Principal Security Engineer
Akamai Technology
Cambridge, MA
If I simply replace "EVP_des_ede3_cbc" with "EVP_des_cbc" ... then it works
okay
Some serious bug?
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Ztatik Light wrote:
> same result - did you actually try it?
>
> BIO_read is producing this error:
>
> "error:06065064:digital envelope routines:EVP_DecryptFinal_
same result - did you actually try it?
BIO_read is producing this error:
"error:06065064:digital envelope routines:EVP_DecryptFinal_ex:bad decrypt"
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Ben Laurie wrote:
> Try
>
> write_data( file_, data, strlen(data) + 1, "mykey");
>
>
>
> On 16 August 2013 03:34
Try
write_data( file_, data, strlen(data) + 1, "mykey");
On 16 August 2013 03:34, Ztatik Light wrote:
> ps, yes, line 29 is a mistake and should read: char new_filename[strlen(
> filename ) + 5];
>
> But even with that fix i get the same results
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Ztatik L
So, I'm having a really weird issue... i'm trying simple file
encryption/decryption with BIO_*, but if the encrypted file is in a
subdirectory.. i get garbage data,
I'll post the code i'm using, with a brief elaboration on how i'm using it
and what behaviour i'm getting:
/
ps, yes, line 29 is a mistake and should read: char new_filename[strlen(
filename ) + 5];
But even with that fix i get the same results
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Ztatik Light wrote:
> maybe not - still confused
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Ztatik Light wrote:
>
>> strange i thi
maybe not - still confused
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Ztatik Light wrote:
> strange i think it has something to do with me using "rb" and "wb" instead
> of "r" and "w"...
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Ztatik Light wrote:
>
>> So, I'm having a really weird issue... i'm trying simpl
strange i think it has something to do with me using "rb" and "wb" instead
of "r" and "w"...
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Ztatik Light wrote:
> So, I'm having a really weird issue... i'm trying simple file
> encryption/decryption with BIO_*, but if the encrypted file is in a
> subdirectory..
13 matches
Mail list logo
