Hi there,
On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Andreas Jungmaier wrote:
> After looking through the openssl-source code I figured (since there
> are BIO-class implementations for memory i/o, socket i/o as well as
> remote procedure call-based i/o and a BIO-null class template) that
> it should be possibl
On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 02:17:24PM +0200, Andreas Jungmaier wrote:
[...]
> After looking through the openssl-source code I figured (since there
> are BIO-class implementations for memory i/o, socket i/o as well as
> remote procedure call-based i/o and a BIO-null class template) that
> it s
From: Albert Serra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Serra> - Is it possible to use OpenSSL on top of RTSP, or UDP? as
Serra> there has been contradictory answers.
It's possible if you add the reliability yourself. UDP is in itself
unreliable, and would therefore in itself not be suitable.
Serra> - If it
Albert,
SSL
can run over ANY reliable transport layer (IP or not).
Making
UDP reliable, with out all the overhead and performance implications of TCP, is
possible and in a few instances desirable.
Hope
this helps,
Jon
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[E
SSL/TLS requires a transport protocol that is like TCP: each byte sent
by "A" is received by "B" exactly once, and in order. If you want to
use OpenSSL on top of anything other than a TCP socket, you will have to
write some code that interfaces your transport into the OpenSSL "BIO"
framework.
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From: Doris Diedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> dido> Nope, it doesn't.
> dido> As far as I know, SSL works on top of UDP too.
>
> Hmm, have you actually tested this? With the cipher DES-CBC3-SHA for
> example? Have you any idea what wo
So,
- Is it possible to use OpenSSL on top of RTSP, or UDP? as there has
been contradictory answers.
- If it is possible, what you have to modify from the Openssl C code?
- The specifications what they pretend to mean, that it is possible
if the transport protocol is reliable.
If you'd read the S
> SSL/TLS can only work on top of TCP.
Rubbish, a collegue of mine integrated SSLeay into our OSI stack, and was
able to run SSL on top of TP0/X.25, TP4/(CLNP), as well as TP0/RFC 1006 ->
TCP.
__
OpenSSL Project
> run SSL over UDP, with a layer that provides reliable delivery.
> Of course that's duplicating the functionality of TCP, but
> people reinvent the wheel all the time...
But there are times when it is quite appropriate to build a guaranteed
delivery protocol on top of UDP. RPC systems are a goo
On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 01:45:37PM +0200, Doris Diedrich wrote:
> Nope, it doesn't.
> As far as I know, SSL works on top of UDP too.
"As far as I know" means "I didn't try it" :-)
Try it on a loaded network. Let us know if it works.
> Have a look in the spec for this.
If you'd read the SSL
From: Doris Diedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
dido> Nope, it doesn't.
dido> As far as I know, SSL works on top of UDP too.
Hmm, have you actually tested this? With the cipher DES-CBC3-SHA for
example? Have you any idea what would happen if a packet was missing?
Undetected?
--
Richard Levitte \
SSL/TLS can only work on top of TCP. SSL/TLS is a connection oriented
protocol. It does not provide support for connectionless sockets.
That is the reason that WTLS was developed for wireless devices.
> Nope, it doesn't.
> As far as I know, SSL works on top of UDP too.
> Have a look in the spec
Nope, it doesn't.
As far as I know, SSL works on top of UDP too.
Have a look in the spec for this.
alas, I don't know if OpenSSL works on top of other protocols, but it
shoukd:
you might want to use BIO's to fake 'normal' sockets.
On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Eric Murray wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 a
On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 09:32:36PM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
>> Yep, it's all you need. It should be stated in the TLS RFC; I
> Oh, and writing the BIO method for RTSP, not to be forgotten...
Or use memory BIOs or a BIO pair.
__
14 matches
Mail list logo
