That makes sense. Thanks to everyone for the responses.
Jason
From: Dave Coombs
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 5:30 PM
To: Jason Schultz
Cc: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: sk_X509_OBJECT_num()
Hi,
They're macros, defined in SKM_DEFINE_STA
Hi,
They're macros, defined in SKM_DEFINE_STACK_OF() in safestack.h. If you
DEFINE_STACK_OF(Foo), you'll automatically end up with a sk_Foo_num() macro.
Cheers,
-Dave
> On Nov 13, 2019, at 12:20, Jason Schultz wrote:
>
> Hello-
>
> I am updating my Linux application from using OpenSSL 1.
On 13/11/2019 17:20, Jason Schultz wrote:
> Hello-
>
> I am updating my Linux application from using OpenSSL 1.0.2 to 1.1.1 in
> preparation for OpenSSL 3.0 (and of course the EOL of 1.0.2). I'm
> confused about the function in the subject line as well as other,
> related sk_X509_* functions.
Hello-
I am updating my Linux application from using OpenSSL 1.0.2 to 1.1.1 in
preparation for OpenSSL 3.0 (and of course the EOL of 1.0.2). I'm confused
about the function in the subject line as well as other, related sk_X509_*
functions.
My code has always used these functions, and currently
