>
> I'm sure Joseph knows all the following, but just to clarify:
>
> With "36^3" Joseph's referring to finding two pre-images that hash to the
> same image. For that attack, the work effort would indeed be 36^3. It's
> not clear from Darryl's query whether his protocol is vulnerable to such
> From: Joseph Ashwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > From: "Darryl Wagoner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: security in small signatures
> > I was wondering if using a 6 characters check signature (0-9A-Z)
> > could provide any trust level?
> >
- Original Message -
From: "Darryl Wagoner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: security in small signatures
> I was wondering if using a 6 characters check signature (0-9A-Z)
> could provide any trust level?
> Are we talking about mins, hours, days or weeks to cra
Greetings,
One of the possible goals of my open Trusted QSL (QSL in amateur radio
means ACK) is to have a small check signature to validate contacts.
I was wondering if using a 6 characters check signature (0-9A-Z)
could provide any trust level? Maybe us the first character as
an starting offset
