oh, I forgot to mention that this behaviour appears in the latest
snapshot (20070816) of openssl-0.9.9-dev.
Am 16.08.2007 um 10:30 schrieb Harald Latzko:
Hello!
Am 14.04.2007 um 00:04 schrieb Dr. Stephen Henson:
'tis done.
I found a quiet period to look into it and test it a little. Check
Hello!
Am 14.04.2007 um 00:04 schrieb Dr. Stephen Henson:
'tis done.
I found a quiet period to look into it and test it a little. Check
out the new
-stream option in the smime utility for OpenSSL 0.9.9.
Support in the API is quite simple too, just include the
PKCS7_STREAM flag in
the cal
Hello!
Am 14.04.2007 um 00:04 schrieb Dr. Stephen Henson:
Sorry to have given you false hopes. The issue that all the data
has to
be in working memory to be encrypted is indeed starting to become
a real
annoyance in some practical circumstances. So perhaps if Stephen
Henson
should develop
Hello,
Am 14.04.2007 um 00:04 schrieb Dr. Stephen Henson:
'tis done.
I found a quiet period to look into it and test it a little. Check
out the new
-stream option in the smime utility for OpenSSL 0.9.9.
Support in the API is quite simple too, just include the
PKCS7_STREAM flag in
the call
Hello,
Am 14.04.2007 um 00:04 schrieb Dr. Stephen Henson:
Sorry to have given you false hopes. The issue that all the data
has to
be in working memory to be encrypted is indeed starting to become
a real
annoyance in some practical circumstances. So perhaps if Stephen
Henson
should develop
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007, Marco Roeland wrote:
> On Saturday March 24th 2007 at 12:58 Harald Latzko wrote:
>
> > I compiled the 0.9.9 snapshot, resulting in a binary that has the
> > same behaviour (growing in RAM very much). Do you know how to enable
> > this experimental code and if this featur
Hello,
Am 24.03.2007 um 14:39 schrieb Dr. Stephen Henson:
No, sorry I do not know how to enable the streaming encryption
support
and it very probably will not be in the command line tool.
I only know beginnings of streaming encryption support exist from
posts
by Dr. Stephen Henson on this
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007, Marco Roeland wrote:
> On Saturday March 24th 2007 at 12:58 Harald Latzko wrote:
>
> > I compiled the 0.9.9 snapshot, resulting in a binary that has the
> > same behaviour (growing in RAM very much). Do you know how to enable
> > this experimental code and if this featur
On Saturday March 24th 2007 at 12:58 Harald Latzko wrote:
> I compiled the 0.9.9 snapshot, resulting in a binary that has the
> same behaviour (growing in RAM very much). Do you know how to enable
> this experimental code and if this feature is included in the openssl
> command line tool?
N
Hello!
Am 23.03.2007 um 20:01 schrieb Marco Roeland:
can anybody even confirm that encrypting files via "openssl smime"
command consumes very much memory?
Yes. The PKCS7_encrypt(3ssl) function needs to hold all the data in
memory as specified in the BUGS section of its man page. As far as I
kno
On Friday March 23rd 2007 at 18:55 Harald Latzko wrote:
> can anybody even confirm that encrypting files via "openssl smime"
> command consumes very much memory?
Yes. The PKCS7_encrypt(3ssl) function needs to hold all the data in
memory as specified in the BUGS section of its man page. As far a
Hello again,
can anybody even confirm that encrypting files via "openssl smime"
command consumes very much memory?
Regards,
Harald
Am 22.03.2007 um 19:29 schrieb Harald Latzko:
Hi!
I encrypt files via openssl on commandline using the following
command:
openssl smime -encrypt -in /tmp/t
Hi!
I encrypt files via openssl on commandline using the following command:
openssl smime -encrypt -in /tmp/testfile -out /tmp/testfile.enc -
nodetach -binary -aes256 -outform DER -engine padlock /tmp/public.pem
Since I use the engine "padlock" on a VIA CPU (openssl speed show an
enormous s
13 matches
Mail list logo
