> P.S. Anyone know where the X.509 V3 spec can be found (without
> having to purchase all $92 of it from ansidocstore which seems
> a little excessive particularly as I've already got the '88 spec)?
Hoyt Kesterson, one of the editors, and Groupe Bull have been making
pre-publication drafts availa
> > This is a non-authenticated attribute. i.e. it's not
> > signed and can be changed by the user without changing
> > the certificate signature.
>
> Wrong. *Everything* in a certificate is signed.
Don't you hate it when you're wrong. Was confusing myself
with S/MIME and M$'s certificate p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> What do You think? May I use the netscape_comment extension to hold my
> application specific information in text form (maybe in base64)?
>
Well you could I suppose but that would be a non standard use of it. If
you've got your own O
Sent by: Subject: RE: netscape_comment
extension
owner-openssl-users@o
> This is a non-authenticated attribute. i.e. it's not signed and can be
> changed by the user without changing the certificate signature.
Wrong. *Everything* in a certificate is signed.
/r$
__
OpenSSL Project
> What do You think? May I use the netscape_comment extension to hold my
> application specific information in text form (maybe in base64)?
This is a non-authenticated attribute. i.e. it's not signed and can be
changed by the user without changing the certificate signature.
So don&#
Hi!
What do You think? May I use the netscape_comment extension to hold my
application specific information in text form (maybe in base64)?
Cly
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User
