Re: libcrypto: Saving sensitive data on an Internet-connected computer.

2000-06-23 Thread Vadim Fedukovich
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 11:55:12PM -0400, Steve Sobol wrote: > ... > I am most worried about people being able to get access to the > database in the event root is compromised. (This is a Linux box that I > am > dealing with). After I sent my original question, I decided that the > only > safe wa

Re: libcrypto: Saving sensitive data on an Internet-connected computer.

2000-06-22 Thread Steve Sobol
Rich Salz wrote: > > > Hello again, folks. I have a bit of a dilemma here. > > Yes, you do. Hey, I'm flattered - I received a reply from Mr. INN. ;) Thanks for your reply. Thanks also to Dr. Henson and Michael Sierchio for theirs. There are two issues at hand: 1) picking the appropriate ciphe

Re: libcrypto: Saving sensitive data on an Internet-connected computer.

2000-06-21 Thread Rich Salz
> Hello again, folks. I have a bit of a dilemma here. Yes, you do. You need to look at what you are trying to protect yourself from. For example, are you worried that someone can download your database? If so, why are you not worried that they could download your decrypt program? If they can do

Re: libcrypto: Saving sensitive data on an Internet-connected computer.

2000-06-19 Thread Dr Stephen Henson
Michael Sierchio wrote: > > Somebody wrote: > > > A 128 key is more than enough for the forseeable future. However your > > original code used a fixed key with RC4. Since RC4 is a stream cipher > > this is horribly insecure. > > > > A stream cipher is effectively a random stream of bytes derived

Re: libcrypto: Saving sensitive data on an Internet-connected computer.

2000-06-19 Thread Michael Sierchio
Somebody wrote: > A 128 key is more than enough for the forseeable future. However your > original code used a fixed key with RC4. Since RC4 is a stream cipher > this is horribly insecure. > > A stream cipher is effectively a random stream of bytes derived from the > key. This is XOR'ed with the

Re: libcrypto: Saving sensitive data on an Internet-connected computer.

2000-06-17 Thread Dr Stephen Henson
Steve Sobol wrote: > > Steve Sobol wrote: > > > > Hello again, folks. I have a bit of a dilemma here. > > I also put a comment into the source code that said I was considering > using a longer key. Now that I think about it - does that buy me > anything, > or is a 128-bit key enough? > A 128 k

Re: libcrypto: Saving sensitive data on an Internet-connected computer.

2000-06-17 Thread Steve Sobol
Steve Sobol wrote: > > Hello again, folks. I have a bit of a dilemma here. I also put a comment into the source code that said I was considering using a longer key. Now that I think about it - does that buy me anything, or is a 128-bit key enough? -- North Shore Technologies, Cleveland, OH ht

libcrypto: Saving sensitive data on an Internet-connected computer.

2000-06-17 Thread Steve Sobol
Hello again, folks. I have a bit of a dilemma here. The dilemma involves encrypting sensitive data like credit card account numbers, to be saved in an online database. The real problem is that I need to be able to decrypt them without having to enter a passphrase of any sort from the server's key