Re: having same pub for multiple apps

2006-06-06 Thread Sudharsan Rangarajan
Hi, I am just thinking of letting the applications not be security aware..and do ssh tunneling to the various apps, in which case it seems pretty secure..Doesnt it? Thanks, Sudharsan On 6/6/06, Kyle Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: All applications must have the private key, or the public ke

Re: having same pub for multiple apps

2006-06-06 Thread Kyle Hamilton
All applications must have the private key, or the public key is useless. And, a public key is worthless without knowing who or what it belongs to, which is where certificates come in. (You have an SSH private key that is used to match up to your SSH public key stored on the server, for example.

Re: having same pub for multiple apps

2006-06-06 Thread Sudharsan Rangarajan
Hi Kyle, Thanks, I was wondering about the folloing scenario. I have a single public key for all apps. Hoever no apps knows the pub key, and all i do is SSH port forwarding. DOes this have any significant problems? Thanks, Sudharsan On 6/6/06, Kyle Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Every appl

Re: having same pub for multiple apps

2006-06-06 Thread Kyle Hamilton
Every application has its opportunity to be stupid and reveal the private key. This is one reason that wildcard certificates are generally frowned on as a "worse practice" -- any single one of the softwares that use the private key can reveal it. (The mantra of security is: "You have to succeed

having same pub for multiple apps

2006-06-05 Thread Sudharsan Rangarajan
Hi all, I am just wondering if i could have multiple applications on a end host share the same public key. Can this cause a pbm in the sense there are more applications to target and a stupid one can reveal the private key? Or can there be other attacks posssible Thanks, Sudharsan ___