Thank-you for your thorough answer, Dave (and sorry for the top-posting
- I wanted to have your message preserved for Felix and Rajiv).
The ica maintainer (in cc) and I were discussing if there is some value
in aborting RSA_Generate_key() used by libica to generate keys.
Libica is a crypto li
> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Klaus Heinrich Kiwi
> Sent: Friday, 25 September, 2009 13:02
> On 09/23/2009 07:59 PM, Dave Thompson wrote:
> > Or it appears you can use the callback to impose a limit on
> the number
> > of tries, amount of time, etc. as you consider approp
On 09/23/2009 07:59 PM, Dave Thompson wrote:
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Klaus Heinrich Kiwi
Sent: Wednesday, 23 September, 2009 15:59
I noted that when generating a RSA public key pair using a
non-standard public exponent (particularly, 65538, or 0x01,
0x00,0x02), the R
> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Klaus Heinrich Kiwi
> Sent: Wednesday, 23 September, 2009 15:59
> I noted that when generating a RSA public key pair using a
> non-standard public exponent (particularly, 65538, or 0x01,
> 0x00,0x02), the RSA_generate_key never returns, and th
I noted that when generating a RSA public key pair using a non-standard
public exponent (particularly, 65538, or 0x01, 0x00,0x02), the
RSA_generate_key never returns, and the program keeps using 100% CPU
until I kill it.
My question is: Is this behavior expected? If some non-standard publ.
ex
