When building openssl with mingw64, make test is hang up.

Hello everyone, I want to contribute my source code to openssl, But I am in trouble: When building openssl with MinGW64, make test is hung up <https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/24436>. For so many days, nobody has replied to me, I value your feedback.

RE: [building OpenSSL for vxWorks on Windows using Cygwin]

st time you mention vxWorks, which makes an enormous difference. Prior to this message, I assumed you were building OpenSSL *for Windows*, since that was the only platform you mentioned. vxWorks is, I believe, an unsupported platform. Someone in the past ported OpenSSL to vxWorks and co

Help - Building OpenSSL FIPS for 64 bit Android

Hi All, I am seeking help on generating FIPS compliance OpenSSL libs for Android Native Application. I am trying to build openssl-1.0.2t with the FIPS module openssl-fips-2.0.16 to support 64-bit android devices, I have tried following the steps on the Openssl wiki

RE: Error building OpenSSL-1.1.1g

ore appropriately submitted as a potential bug in the build process. -Original Message- From: mhkelley2...@gmail.com Sent: Friday, June 26, 2020 12:09 PM To: openssl-users@openssl.org Cc: 'Michael Wojcik' Subject: RE: Error building OpenSSL-1.1.1g Thank you very much. While my proble

RE: Error building OpenSSL-1.1.1g

basic installation (at least the most recent version) and it works. Don't mess that one up or your in for some fun. Thanks to all. -Original Message- From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Michael Wojcik Sent: Friday, June 26, 2020 11:25 AM To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: RE: Err

RE: Error building OpenSSL-1.1.1g

2020 9:56 AM To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: Re: Error building OpenSSL-1.1.1g On 26/06/2020 14:30, Matt Caswell wrote: >> C:\Perl64\bin\perl.exe Try *removing* this perl from your %PATH%. It may well be that your MSYS2 environment already has perl available but this version is taki

RE: Error building OpenSSL-1.1.1g

r, and thus can be expected to work for the Visual Studio configurations but probably not for the MSYS2 configurations. In my experience, getting Perl to cooperate is the biggest hurdle in building OpenSSL on Windows, and historically for us has been the most fragile aspect. As the OpenSSL b

RE: Error building OpenSSL-1.1.1g

can check that out. Mike -Original Message- From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Matt Caswell Sent: Friday, June 26, 2020 9:56 AM To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: Re: Error building OpenSSL-1.1.1g On 26/06/2020 14:30, Matt Caswell wrote: >> C:\Perl64\bin\perl.exe Try *removing

Re: Error building OpenSSL-1.1.1g

>> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Matt >> Caswell >> Sent: Friday, June 26, 2020 3:04 AM >> To: openssl-users@openssl.org >> Subject: Re: Error build

RE: Error building OpenSSL-1.1.1g

e From: Sergio NNX Sent: Friday, June 26, 2020 8:59 AM To: openssl-users@openssl.org Cc: mhkelley2...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Error building OpenSSL-1.1.1g It is so easy to build OpenSSL using MinGW/MSYS! Just type: ./Configure mingw64 ... make all

Re: Error building OpenSSL-1.1.1g

than happy to assist you. Have fun. From: openssl-users on behalf of Matt Caswell Sent: Friday, 26 June 2020 11:30 PM To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: Re: Error building OpenSSL-1.1.1g On 26/06/2020 14:27, mhkelley2...@gmail.com wrote: > Matt, > &

RE: Error building OpenSSL-1.1.1g

ike -Original Message- From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Matt Caswell Sent: Friday, June 26, 2020 7:31 AM To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: Re: Error building OpenSSL-1.1.1g On 26/06/2020 14:27, mhkelley2...@gmail.com wrote: > Matt, > > Thanks for your suggestion ..

Re: Error building OpenSSL-1.1.1g

On 26/06/2020 14:27, mhkelley2...@gmail.com wrote: > Matt, > > Thanks for your suggestion ... > >>> >>> 2. Has anyone succeeded building OpenSSL for use in a Windows >>> 10 environment *without* need for visual studio? >> >> You can do this

RE: Error building OpenSSL-1.1.1g

Matt, Thanks for your suggestion ... >> >> 2. Has anyone succeeded building OpenSSL for use in a Windows >> 10 environment *without* need for visual studio? > > You can do this using the MinGW compilers and the MSys2 shell. Note the > MinGW compilers target *native* w

Re: Error building OpenSSL-1.1.1g

u will need to make sure both Perl (e.g. Strawberry Perl) and NASM are installed and are on your %PATH%. > > 2. Has anyone succeeded building OpenSSL for use in a Windows 10 environment > *without* need for visual studio? You can do this using the MinGW compilers and the MSys2 shell. Note

RE: Error building OpenSSL-1.1.1g

accomplish that? 2. Has anyone succeeded building OpenSSL for use in a Windows 10 environment *without* need for visual studio? I'd really appreciate any useful information or pointers to such. Thanks. -Original Message- From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Matt Caswell Sent: Thursday

RE: Error building OpenSSL-1.1.1g

> From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of > mhkelley2...@gmail.com > Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2020 14:20 > crypto\aes\aesni-mb-x86_64.obj : fatal error LNK1112: module machine type > 'x64' conflicts with target machine type 'x86' For some reason - I can't tell

Re: Error building OpenSSL-1.1.1g

7;0x2' > Stop. > > -Original Message- > From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Matt > Caswell > Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2020 12:15 PM > To: openssl-users@openssl.org > Subject: Re: Error building OpenSSL-1.1.1g > > > > On 25/06/2020 18:32, Michael Wojcik

RE: Error building OpenSSL-1.1.1g

'x86' Could Not Find c:\Users\Owner\LocalPrograms\OpenSSL\openssl-1.1.1g\libcrypto-1_1-x64.* NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'link' : return code '0x1' Stop. NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2019\Community\VC\Tools\M

Re: Error building OpenSSL-1.1.1g

On 25/06/2020 18:32, Michael Wojcik wrote: >> From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of >> mhkelley2...@gmail.com >> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2020 11:54 > >> Error: 'ml64' is not recognized as an internal or external command, >> operable program or batch file

RE: Error building OpenSSL-1.1.1g

> From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of > mhkelley2...@gmail.com > Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2020 11:54 > Error: 'ml64' is not recognized as an internal or external command, > operable program or batch file. It's part of Visual C. The VC-WIN64A-masm configur

Error building OpenSSL-1.1.1g

Error: 'ml64' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. Platform: Windows 10 Intended context for use: Mingw-64, Qt 5.15 Building with Visual Studio 2019 Community Perl: ActivePerl 5.24.3 Build_2404 (64-bit) Configuration commands: perl Con

Re: Building OpenSSL

On Thu, 28 May 2020 13:20:02 +0200, Johnny Black wrote: > Hi,  > > I'm having problems installing openssl. > I downloaded 1.1.1 version from the website and > I followed all the instructions but > when I run the "nmake" command I get an error. > It says, I quote: > "ias   -d debug -o crypto\aes\ae

Building OpenSSL

Hi, I'm having problems installing openssl. I downloaded 1.1.1 version from the website and I followed all the instructions but when I run the "nmake" command I get an error. It says, I quote: "ias -d debug -o crypto\aes\aes-ia64.obj "crypto\aes\aes-ia64.asm" "NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'ias' :

Re: building openssl 1.1.1 for Solaris 10

Michael Wojcik wrote: From: tim.j.culh...@gmail.com [mailto:tim.j.culh...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2020 01:25 I ran the gmake and it fails with the below ld errors. Is this the known issue mentioned previously with building openssl on Sparc or is it caused by something else

RE: building openssl 1.1.1 for Solaris 10

> From: tim.j.culh...@gmail.com [mailto:tim.j.culh...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2020 01:25 > > I ran the gmake and it fails with the below ld errors. > > Is this the known issue mentioned previously with building openssl on Sparc > or is it cau

RE: building openssl 1.1.1 for Solaris 10

Hi again, I ran the gmake and it fails with the below ld errors. Is this the known issue mentioned previously with building openssl on Sparc or is it caused by something else? Thanks, Tim ${LDCMD:-cc} -xarch=v9 -xstrconst -Xa -xO5 -xdepend -m64 -L. -mt \ -o apps/openssl apps/asn1pars.o

RE: building openssl 1.1.1 for Solaris 10

> From: tim.j.culh...@gmail.com [mailto:tim.j.culh...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, April 06, 2020 09:15 > > I'm using gcc 4.9.2 > > > So, should I just ignore that warning and let the gmake continue? Yes, that's what I would recommend. If it bugs you, you could always experiment with changing it,

RE: building openssl 1.1.1 for Solaris 10

Hi, I'm using gcc 4.9.2 So, should I just ignore that warning and let the gmake continue? Tim -Original Message- From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Michael Wojcik Sent: Monday 6 April 2020 15:31 To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: RE: building openssl 1.1.1 for Solaris 10 &

RE: building openssl 1.1.1 for Solaris 10

> From: tim.j.culh...@gmail.com [mailto:tim.j.culh...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, April 06, 2020 06:35 > To: Michael Wojcik; openssl-users@openssl.org > Subject: RE: building openssl 1.1.1 for Solaris 10 > > Ok, attempting to build openssl 1.1.1e now. > > As prompted b

RE: building openssl 1.1.1 for Solaris 10

nal Message- From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Michael Wojcik Sent: Friday 3 April 2020 23:17 To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: RE: building openssl 1.1.1 for Solaris 10 > From: tim.j.culh...@gmail.com [mailto:tim.j.culh...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, April 03, 2020 15:21 > >

RE: building openssl 1.1.1 for Solaris 10

> From: tim.j.culh...@gmail.com [mailto:tim.j.culh...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, April 03, 2020 15:21 > > Just wondering if there is a man page or similar on openssl.org which > describes the steps. As I noted before, INSTALL and NOTES.TXT. Those are in the root of the OpenSSL source distribut

RE: building openssl 1.1.1 for Solaris 10

No, not run into that issue. Just wondering if there is a man page or similar on openssl.org which describes the steps. Tim -Original Message- From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Michael Wojcik Sent: Friday 3 April 2020 19:49 To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: RE: building openssl

RE: building openssl 1.1.1 for Solaris 10

> From: Quanah Gibson-Mount [mailto:qua...@symas.com] > Sent: Friday, April 03, 2020 12:06 > > --On Friday, April 3, 2020 6:31 PM + Michael Wojcik > wrote: > > >> From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf > >> Of tim.j.culh...@gmail.com > >> Sent: Friday, April 0

RE: building openssl 1.1.1 for Solaris 10

--On Friday, April 3, 2020 6:31 PM + Michael Wojcik wrote: From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of tim.j.culh...@gmail.com Sent: Friday, April 03, 2020 10:49 Are there instructions somewhere for building and installing openssl 1.1.1 from source for

RE: building openssl 1.1.1 for Solaris 10

> From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of > tim.j.culh...@gmail.com > Sent: Friday, April 03, 2020 10:49 > > Are there instructions somewhere for building and installing openssl 1.1.1 > from source for Solaris 10? You mean beyond what's in INSTALL and NOTES.UNI

building openssl 1.1.1 for Solaris 10

Hi, Are there instructions somewhere for building and installing openssl 1.1.1 from source for Solaris 10? Many thanks, Tim

AW: AW: building OpenSSL 1.1.1 with -DPURIFY

> > The easiest way to obtain the fix is to update to the current head of the > > 1.1.1. stable branch. > > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commits/OpenSSL_1_0_1-stable > > I think you meant to link to the 1.1.1 branch not 1.0.1! > > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commits/OpenSSL_1_1_1-st

RE: building OpenSSL 1.1.1 with -DPURIFY

To: tim.j.culh...@gmail.com; 'Tomas Mraz' ; openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: AW: building OpenSSL 1.1.1 with -DPURIFY Hi Tim, > However, when I run the tests there appears to be failures. > > Extract of the make test output below: > > > .

Re: AW: building OpenSSL 1.1.1 with -DPURIFY

On 09/10/2019 22:57, Dr. Matthias St. Pierre wrote: > Hi Tim, > >> However, when I run the tests there appears to be failures. >> >> Extract of the make test output below: >> >> >> ../test/recipes/20-test_enc.t .. >> Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) >> Failed 1/1

AW: building OpenSSL 1.1.1 with -DPURIFY

Hi Tim, > However, when I run the tests there appears to be failures. > > Extract of the make test output below: > > > ../test/recipes/20-test_enc.t .. > Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) > Failed 1/172 subtests Your test failure looks like issue https://github.

RE: building OpenSSL 1.1.1 with -DPURIFY

er 2019 14:30 To: tim.j.culh...@gmail.com; openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: Re: building OpenSSL 1.1.1 with -DPURIFY On Wed, 2019-10-09 at 11:37 +0100, tim.j.culh...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi, > > I've built OpenSSL 1.1.1c locally on my 64 bit CentOS 7 server. > > My applica

Re: building OpenSSL 1.1.1 with -DPURIFY

On Wed, 2019-10-09 at 11:37 +0100, tim.j.culh...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi, > > I've built OpenSSL 1.1.1c locally on my 64 bit CentOS 7 server. > > My application links with the libraries contained in this build. > > When running tests for my application under valgrind I'm seeing lots > of > erro

Re: building OpenSSL 1.1.1 with -DPURIFY

Emilia's work removed the need to add -DPURIFY; you never need to add it. Note that the BN code is clever, it doesn't bother to zero everything when it knows which bits within a word it is using.

Re: building OpenSSL 1.1.1 with -DPURIFY

On Wed, 09 Oct 2019 11:37:02 +0100, tim.j.culh...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi, > > I've built OpenSSL 1.1.1c locally on my 64 bit CentOS 7 server. > > My application links with the libraries contained in this build. > > When running tests for my application under valgrind I'm seeing lots of > error

building OpenSSL 1.1.1 with -DPURIFY

Hi, I've built OpenSSL 1.1.1c locally on my 64 bit CentOS 7 server. My application links with the libraries contained in this build. When running tests for my application under valgrind I'm seeing lots of errors like the below: Use of uninitialised value of size 8 at 0x4C30DDF: memset (

Re: building openssl-1.1.1d with "enable-deprecated"

On 16/09/2019 16:26, Peter Sui wrote: > Hi Matt,  >        I said " It does not work" means, after I build the open-ssl1.1.1d with > or without the "enable-deprecated" configuration, then use the library, header > files in my application as before with the older version(1.0.2t), then my > build

Re: building openssl-1.1.1d with "enable-deprecated"

Hi Matt, I said " It does not work" means, after I build the open-ssl1.1.1d with or without the "enable-deprecated" configuration, then use the library, header files in my application as before with the older version(1.0.2t), then my build failed, the errors are like: Error C3861 'HMAC_CTX_i

Re: building openssl-1.1.1d with "enable-deprecated"

Matt has answered the main question, but as an aside: -D"_CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE" suppresses warning messages from Microsoft's Visual C compiler for using various standard C library functions, rather than using the optional "secure" ones (a misnomer, as they are at best somewhat easier to use

Re: building openssl-1.1.1d with "enable-deprecated"

On 16/09/2019 16:09, Peter Sui wrote: > Hi Matt, >         So you are saying configuring with "enable-deprecated" or not won't > make > the build different, they are all actually support the deprecated functions, > right ? Right. > If yes, then in my application , if  I have "OPENSSL_USE_DEPR

Re: building openssl-1.1.1d with "enable-deprecated"

Hi Matt, So you are saying configuring with "enable-deprecated" or not won't make the build different, they are all actually support the deprecated functions, right ? If yes, then in my application , if I have "OPENSSL_USE_DEPRECATED" defined, the depecated functions in my application shou

Re: building openssl-1.1.1d with "enable-deprecated"

On 16/09/2019 15:44, Peter Sui wrote: > Hi, >        From the openssl website, I got the folloeing instruction: > " > Access to deprecated functions/macros has been removed by default. To enable > access you must do two things. 1) Build OpenSSL with deprecation support (pass > "enable-deprecated

RE: building openssl-1.1.1d with "enable-deprecated"

Hi, From the openssl website, I got the folloeing instruction: " Access to deprecated functions/macros has been removed by default. To enable access you must do two things. 1) Build OpenSSL with deprecation support (pass "enable-deprecated" as an argument to config) 2) Applications must defi

RE: Building OpenSSL

f this is a stupid question. Neither. Either. Both. (All, since there seems to be some MD2/MD4 confusion here.) It depends entirely on what you're building OpenSSL for. You haven't told us, so we have no way of answering your question. Most people have no need for MD2, MD4, or RC5.

Re: Building OpenSSL

_ From: openssl-users on behalf of Osman Zakir Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2019 9:39 PM To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: Re: Building OpenSSL Okay, I was able to build it and am running the tests now. How do I know whether to enable RC5 or MD4, though? Which one do I

Re: Building OpenSSL

Okay, I was able to build it and am running the tests now. How do I know whether to enable RC5 or MD4, though? Which one do I enable? Sorry if this is a stupid question. And what's "afalg" (in "test_afalf")?

Building OpenSSL

I want to build OpenSSL for an x64 Windows 10 OS. I tried to configure it on the Developer Command Prompt for VS 2019 by running "perl Configure VC-WIN64A", but it gave me this error: " Can't locate Win32/Console.pm in @INC (you may need to install the Win32::Console module) (@INC contains: C:

Issue Building OpenSSL with "enable-static-engine" for MD & MT Builds for x86

Hi All, I am trying to build OpenSSL DLLs for MD and MT for windows on X86 and x64. I am building it for Visual studio vs 2017, 2015 and 2013. When I configure the build using following command on Visual Studio2015 x86 command prompt , "namke" is throwing error But the same is working w

Re: Issue Building OpenSSL version 1.1.1b using batch files Missing do_win64a/nt.mak/nt-dbg.mak

On Fri, Jul 26, 2019, 5:44 AM manoj upadhyay wrote: > This what we changed to. Will this method not work for you? > > > P.S: I am able to build the code using the standard method below. >perl Configure VC-WIN64A > nmake > nmake test > nmake install >

Re: Issue Building OpenSSL version 1.1.1b using batch files Missing do_win64a/nt.mak/nt-dbg.mak

Found similar issues with our Windows 1.0.2 to 1.1.1c upgrade. Had to change our build process per INSTALL doc. The dll files are named differently which impacted our package and install process. Th On Fri, Jul 26, 2019, 5:44 AM manoj upadhyay wrote: > Hi All, > > I need help in building the

Issue Building OpenSSL version 1.1.1b using batch files Missing do_win64a/nt.mak/nt-dbg.mak

Hi All, I need help in building the OpenSSL 1.1.1b using the batch files. I have existing batch files to build OpenSSL "1.0.2p". It uses following files to build OpenSSL. 1. ms\do_win64a 2. nt.mak 3. nt-dbg.mak But above files are missing from 1.1.1b. For reference I am adding code

Re: help - building OpenSSL fips for 64 bit Android

>that the setenv-android.sh script doesn't account for 64 bit architectures. Correct. The current FIPS module has not been modified for quite some time, and your platform is not supported. If you cannot follow the steps *exactly* you cannot claim FIPS validation. The OpenSSL project is wo

Re: help - building OpenSSL fips for 64 bit Android

Forgot to mention I am trying to cross compile on a MacBook Pro (15-inch, 2017) running MacOS 10.14.5 -- Sent from: http://openssl.6102.n7.nabble.com/OpenSSL-User-f3.html

help - building OpenSSL fips for 64 bit Android

I am trying to build openssl-1.0.2s with the fips module openssl-fips-ecp-2.0.16 to support 64 bit android devices, I have tried following the steps on the wiki and noticed that the setenv-android.sh script doesn't account for 64 bit

Re: building openssl for windows - missing do_win64a from ms directory.

I'd suggest reading the files called 'README' and 'INSTALL' as a start. Cheers Richard "Lewis, Michael L" skrev: (11 juni 2019 18:55:48 CEST) >Hi, > >I'm trying to build OpenSSL for windows (openssl-1.1.1c), I do the >following steps: > > >1. cd into open ssl directory. > >2. Run:

Re: building openssl for windows - missing do_win64a from ms directory.

* The issue I have is that I don’t see ‘do_win64a’ within the ‘ms’ directory (I’m following build instructions here: http://eran.geek.co.il/wp/archives/3897

building openssl for windows - missing do_win64a from ms directory.

Hi, I'm trying to build OpenSSL for windows (openssl-1.1.1c), I do the following steps: 1. cd into open ssl directory. 2. Run: perl Configure VC-WIN64A, this appears to work fine ... C:\develop\ignite\openssl-1.1.1c>perl Configure VC-WIN64A Configuring OpenSSL version 1.1.1c (0

Fw: Building openssl outside of the source tree" doesn't work well

Dear, Please help check this. I attached the config dump in previous email. Thanks, Wenbin - Forwarded Message - From: dengwenbin_0301 Date: 05/27/2019 14:24 To: Richard Levitte Subject: Re:Re: Fw:Re:Re: Building openssl outside of the source tree" doesn't work well

Fw: Building openssl outside of the source tree" doesn't work well

Please help have a look. | | dengwenbin_0301 邮箱：dengwenbin_0...@126.com | Signature is customized by Netease Mail Master - Forwarded Message - From: dengwenbin_0301 Date: 05/27/2019 14:24 To: Richard Levitte Subject: Re:Re: Fw:Re:Re: Building openssl outside of the source tree

Re: Fw:Re:Re: Building openssl outside of the source tree" doesn't work well

uot; > Date: 2019-05-22 09:40:19 > To: "Richard Levitte" > Subject: Re:Re: Building openssl outside of the source tree" doesn't work well > Thanks for your reply, Richard. > > Yes, the "-Iinclude -Iapps/include" is missing. I don't know why this &

Re: Building openssl outside of the source tree" doesn't work well

On Tue, 21 May 2019 03:26:41 +0200, dengwenbin_0301 wrote: > > wdeng@pek-dliu4-u1:~/wenbindfiles/openssl/openssl [master]$ cd obj/ > > wdeng@pek-dliu4-u1:~/wenbindfiles/openssl/openssl/obj [master]$ ../config > Operating system: x86_64-whatever-linux2 > Configuring OpenSSL version 3.0.0-dev for t

Building openssl outside of the source tree" doesn't work well

Dear all, Following the instructions in chapter 1c "Configure OpenSSL for building outside of the source tree." of INSTALL doc, I create "obj" folder under the top directory and try to build in that folder. The result shows some header file for the file app_rand.c is not included. Is this a bu

Re: Building OpenSSL with Emscripten

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52327290/linking-openssl-with-webassembly Looks very similar... 'target_link_libraries(mainTest crypto) after that it all worked without warnings.' On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 1:56 AM Richard Levitte wrote: > The issue isn't with any defined or not so defined ma

Re: Building OpenSSL with Emscripten

The issue isn't with any defined or not so defined macro, but most probably rather with how you're loading the library in the 3rd party code base. Could it be that you're linking with libssl only? Cheers, Richard On Fri, 10 May 2019 22:29:36 +0200, Sunghyun Park wrote: > > Hi, all. Thanks for y

Re: Building OpenSSL with Emscripten

Hi, all. Thanks for your help, I could finish compilation to the end. However, athough I successfully compiled with _no-asm_ options, I found a problem when loading the compiled library in the 3rd party code base. When looking into the source code, the definition of some function seems to require a

Re: Building OpenSSL with Emscripten

I realized I made a mistake when I tried that option before. Now it works great. Thank you! :) On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:43 PM Dr Paul Dale wrote: > Configure with the _no-asm_ option. > > It will be a **lot** slower. > > > Pauli > -- > Dr Paul Dale | Cryptographer | Network Security & Encryptio

Re: Building OpenSSL with Emscripten

By the way, has anyone worked on a feature or patch to use browser provided crypto functions (WebCrypto etc.) when compiled to pseudo-javascript via EmScripten or WebAssembly? On 10/05/2019 07:43, Dr Paul Dale wrote: Configure with the _no-asm_ option. It will be a **lot** slower. On 10 May 2

Re: Building OpenSSL with Emscripten

Configure with the _no-asm_ option. It will be a **lot** slower. Pauli -- Dr Paul Dale | Cryptographer | Network Security & Encryption Phone +61 7 3031 7217 Oracle Australia > On 10 May 2019, at 3:33 pm, Sunghyun Park wrote: > > Nice to meet you all :) > > I faced a problem while buildin

Building OpenSSL with Emscripten

Nice to meet you all :) I faced a problem while building assembly code in OpenSSL (e.g., crypto/x86_64cpuid.s) with Emscripten. Since Emscripten does not support compilation for assembly code (As far as I know), I'm wondering if there is any version of OpenSSL that does not require compiling assem

Re: Reg: Building Openssl 1.1.1b for Borland

main reason was lack of docs (or not being able to find the docs) Could you please help in building Openssl 1.1.1b with Borland? Please suggest what are the conf files to be added to generate makefile. It's not just about the conf file, you most probably need a separate Makefile template

Re: Reg: Building Openssl 1.1.1b for Borland

(or not being able to find the docs) > Could you please help in building Openssl 1.1.1b with Borland? > Please suggest what are the conf files to be added to generate makefile. It's not just about the conf file, you most probably need a separate Makefile template too. For starters, I

Reg: Building Openssl 1.1.1b for Borland

Hi, We would like to build Openssl 1.1.1b with Borland compiler (bcc32 - Embarcadero C++ 7.40). Seems support for Borland is removed from 1.1.x . Could you please help in building Openssl 1.1.1b with Borland? Please suggest what are the conf files to be added to generate makefile. Thanks in

Re: Building OpenSSL 1.1.1b for WinCE700

Hello, It works with our custommized cURL code. I wrote a detailed build instruction for CE. https://qiita.com/souju/items/94117c024862f57459c3 > It would be good if you created a github PR for this so the changes can be > considered for inclusion. Thank you. I post the PR. https://github.co

RE: Using (not building) openssl with mingw on Windows 10

> From: Michael Wojcik > Without picking at the problem files myself, not really. It's > probably something that will be fairly obvious in retrospect but I'm > not seeing it from here. > > The import libraries (I'm assuming libssl.lib is one as well, on > your system) basically tell the linker "

Re: Using (not building) openssl with mingw on Windows 10

> "c:/program files/mingw/bin/gcc.exe" -D_MT -DTPM_WINDOWS -I. -shared -o > libibmtss.dll tssfile.o tsscryptoh.o tsscrypto.o tssprintcmd.o tss.o > tssproperties.o tssmarshal.o tssauth.o tssutils.o tsssocket.o tssdev.o > tsstransmit.o tssresponsecode.o tssccattributes.o tssprint.o Unmarshal.o > Com

Re: Using (not building) openssl with mingw on Windows 10

On 3/22/2019 12:18 PM, Michael Wojcik wrote: I seem to have discarded some of your older messages. Did you ever send us the actual link command that's being used? Maybe that will throw some light on the problem. "c:/program files/mingw/bin/gcc.exe" -D_MT -DTPM_WINDOWS -I. -shared -o libibmts

RE: Using (not building) openssl with mingw on Windows 10

> From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of > Ken Goldman > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 13:44 > To: openssl-users@openssl.org > > On 3/20/2019 12:41 PM, Michael Wojcik wrote: > > > > > Sounds like you might have import libraries there. Does "ar t > > libcrypto.l

Re: Using (not building) openssl with mingw on Windows 10

On 3/20/2019 6:44 PM, Sergio NNX wrote: I've been happily using the Shining Light 32-bit binaries with both openssl 1.0 and 1.1 and mingw. Getting back to this: I tried mingw linking against these "c:/program files/openssl64/lib/libcrypto.lib" "c:/program files/openssl64/lib/libssl.lib"

Re: Using (not building) openssl with mingw on Windows 10

had to do the same for 1.1.1.) I'm not building OpenSSL. I use Shining Light, because I don't want to ship OpenSSL with my code and I certainly don't want to require my users to build it.

Re: Using (not building) openssl with mingw on Windows 10

>> I've been happily using the Shining Light 32-bit binaries with both >> openssl 1.0 and 1.1 and mingw. a) Where can we download OpenSSL binaries (x64) for Windows built with MinGW? [ https://slproweb.com/products/Win32OpenSSL.html ] b) D:\Temp-Apps\OpenSSL-Win64\bin>openssl version -a

RE: Using (not building) openssl with mingw on Windows 10

> From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of > Ken Goldman > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 08:46 > To: openssl-users@openssl.org > Subject: Re: Using (not building) openssl with mingw on Windows 10 > > On 10/29/2018 7:18 AM, Jakob Bohm vi

Re: Using (not building) openssl with mingw on Windows 10

On 10/29/2018 7:18 AM, Jakob Bohm via openssl-users wrote: On 26/10/2018 23:08, Ken Goldman wrote: I've been happily using the Shining Light 32-bit binaries with both openssl 1.0 and 1.1 and mingw. On a new machine, I tried the 64-bit binaries.  However, they're missing the openssl/lib/mingw

Re: Building OpenSSL 1.1.1b for WinCE700

On 19/03/2019 07:08, 田中創樹 wrote: > Hello, > > I have successfully build OpenSSL 1.1.1b (only libraries, no app) for > WINCE700-ARMV4I, though I don't do any tests. Here is what I did. I hope > original sources will be changed so as there is no need to change. It would be good if you created a

RE: Building OpenSSL 1.1.1b for WinCE700

: openssl-users De la part de Envoyé : 19 March 2019 08:09 À : openssl-users@openssl.org Objet : Building OpenSSL 1.1.1b for WinCE700 Hello, I have successfully build OpenSSL 1.1.1b (only libraries, no app) for WINCE700-ARMV4I, though I don't do any tests. Here is what I did. I hope ori

Building OpenSSL 1.1.1b for WinCE700

Hello, I have successfully build OpenSSL 1.1.1b (only libraries, no app) for WINCE700-ARMV4I, though I don't do any tests. Here is what I did. I hope original sources will be changed so as there is no need to change. 1. Modify wcecompat. Add an alias, "_access" for access() in wcecompat io.h as

Re: [openssl-users] Using (not building) openssl with mingw on Windows 10

On 26/10/2018 23:08, Ken Goldman wrote: I've been happily using the Shining Light 32-bit binaries with both openssl 1.0 and 1.1 and mingw. On a new machine, I tried the 64-bit binaries.  However, they're missing the openssl/lib/mingw directory where the .a files resided. It looks like the li

[openssl-users] Using (not building) openssl with mingw on Windows 10

I've been happily using the Shining Light 32-bit binaries with both openssl 1.0 and 1.1 and mingw. On a new machine, I tried the 64-bit binaries. However, they're missing the openssl/lib/mingw directory where the .a files resided. It looks like the link procedure changed. Any hints before I

[openssl-users] building openssl 1.1.1 using CrystaX NDK 10.3.2 (Android)

Hi, I want to add openssl to OSGeo4A <https://github.com/opengisch/OSGeo4A>, which is built with CrystaX NDK. I have run into issues building openssl, missing random functions: arm-linux-androideabi-gcc -I. -Icrypto/include -Iinclude -I../openssl-1.1.1 -I../openssl-1.1.1/crypto/include -

Re: [openssl-users] Building openssl-1.1.1

> On Sep 17, 2018, at 1:30 AM, Billy Brumley wrote: > >> openssl version >> openssl: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.1: version >> `OPENSSL_1_1_1' not found (required by openssl) >> openssl: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.1: version >> `OPENSSL_1_1_1' not found (required by openss

Re: [openssl-users] Building openssl-1.1.1

> openssl version > openssl: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.1: version > `OPENSSL_1_1_1' not found (required by openssl) > openssl: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.1: version > `OPENSSL_1_1_1' not found (required by openssl) Sounds like a loader issue. Try "which openssl" then "ld

  1   2   3   4   >