On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 05:55:37PM +0200, Erno Kovacs wrote:
> > The 0.9.8e version did not use the key length correctly.
> > http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=15978
> > The 0.9.8d and 0.9.8g code should be correct.
>
> 0.9.8g on windows (provided by Shining Light) is still incorrect.
> Shou
> The 0.9.8e version did not use the key length correctly.
> http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=15978
> The 0.9.8d and 0.9.8g code should be correct.
0.9.8g on windows (provided by Shining Light) is still incorrect.
Should i report this bug directly to them?
Erno
___
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 04:50:08PM +0200, Erno Kovacs wrote:
> One of my applications broke just after i upgraded Openssl from 0.9.8d.
> After several hours of debugging I realized, something is fishy around
> the blowfish cipher: it just doesnt produces the same ciphertext as it
> did using the 0
One of my applications broke just after i upgraded Openssl from 0.9.8d.
After several hours of debugging I realized, something is fishy around
the blowfish cipher: it just doesnt produces the same ciphertext as it
did using the 0.9.8d.
You can find the really small and stupid source code which pro
