In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:27:12 +0200, "Dr. Stephen
Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
steve> On Mon, Jul 19, 2004, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
steve>
steve> > Since you're doing this by programming:
steve> >
steve> > - You get the validity limits, using the
Thanks for ur help.
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dr.
>Stephen Henson
>Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 4:57 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: X.509 certificates invalid certiifcates.
>
>
>On Mon, Jul 1
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 19 Jul 2004 09:51:35 +0530, <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
>
> sakthi.subramaniam>
> sakthi.subramaniam> >Its not clear what you want to do from this 30/31 years
> business.
> sakthi.subramaniam> T
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 19 Jul 2004 09:51:35 +0530, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
sakthi.subramaniam>
sakthi.subramaniam> >Its not clear what you want to do from this 30/31 years business.
sakthi.subramaniam> The number of years difference between "Not Valid
sakthi.subramaniam> before
PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dr.
>Stephen Henson
>Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2004 2:28 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: X.509 certificates invalid certiifcates.
>
>
>On Thu, Jul 15, 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi.,
>>
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi.,
> I am passing the certificates which will be valid for 31 years for
> openssl routines.. but the I need to have implementation that it should
> check only for 30 years..Is there any function available? Currently I am
> calling x509_verify
