On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 01:38:41PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 8/18/20 9:49 AM, Matt Caswell wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 17/08/2020 18:55, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> 1) Is 'auth_level' supposed to work for this? The CHANGES.md change
> >>references SSL_CTX_set_security_level and openssl(1) claim
On 8/18/20 9:49 AM, Matt Caswell wrote:
>
>
> On 17/08/2020 18:55, John Baldwin wrote:
>> 1) Is 'auth_level' supposed to work for this? The CHANGES.md change
>>references SSL_CTX_set_security_level and openssl(1) claims that
>>'-auth_level' changes this? Is the CHANGES.md entry wrong an
On 17/08/2020 18:55, John Baldwin wrote:
> 1) Is 'auth_level' supposed to work for this? The CHANGES.md change
>references SSL_CTX_set_security_level and openssl(1) claims that
>'-auth_level' changes this? Is the CHANGES.md entry wrong and only
>SECLEVEL=0 for the ciphers work by d
Sadly, I need to be able to test some KTLS changes I have in FreeBSD
that support legacy clients still using TLS 1.0. After seeing the note
in CHANGES.md about TLS 1.0 signature algs no longer being permitted
in the default security level, I tried using '-auth_level=0' to lower
the security level,
