Re: Stanford SRP (offtopic)

2000-12-19 Thread Sean Wieland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Please don't send separate posts with the same question to multiple > lists. Response copied form openssl-dev My appologies. I sent it to the dev list first, then realized that such a question was probably more appropriate in the users list. If it were possible to

Re: Stanford SRP

2000-12-19 Thread kermit-support
> I'm a bit of a newbie and am trying to get some clarification and better > understanding on an issue (spurred by Seifred's controversial article): > > How does using Stanford SRP solve (or does it?) verification, the MITM > problem, and need for a CA? > http://www-c

Stanford SRP

2000-12-19 Thread Sean Wieland
I'm a bit of a newbie and am trying to get some clarification and better understanding on an issue (spurred by Seifred's controversial article): How does using Stanford SRP solve (or does it?) verification, the MITM problem, and need for a CA? http://www-cs-students.stanford.ed