PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: SSLv2_method and SSLv23_method
FW: Re: SSLv2_method and SSLv23_methodDid you try SSLv2_method()?
Greg Stark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Hieu Nguyen
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: Monday, May 07,
FW: Re: SSLv2_method and SSLv23_methodDid you try SSLv2_method()?
Greg Stark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Hieu Nguyen
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 12:01 PM
Subject: FW: Re: SSLv2_method and SSL
Hieu Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [1 ]
> I want to use SSLv23_method to create SSL_CTX for my client program. I
> worked OK if the server supports SSLv3 or TLS 1.0.
> However, if the server only supports SSLv2 (as one of our current server)
> it seems that my program only negotiates SSLv3
Title: FW: Re: SSLv2_method and SSLv23_method
I want to use SSLv23_method to create SSL_CTX for my client program. I worked OK if the server supports SSLv3 or TLS 1.0.
However, if the server only supports SSLv2 (as one of our current server) it seems that my program only negotiates SSLv3 and
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 09:22:24AM +0800, Michael Lee wrote:
> Bodo Moeller wrote:
>> Note that SSLv2_method will fail for some servers because they
>> no longer support SSL 2.0 (and stopping to support it is a good
>> thing because of its deficiencies). I suggest using
>> SSLv23_method without
Bodo Moeller wrote:
> Note that SSLv2_method will fail for some servers because they
> no longer support SSL 2.0 (and stopping to support it is a good
> thing because of its deficiencies). I suggest using
> SSLv23_method without SSL_OP_NO_TLSv1 in a first connection attempt;
> if this fails, try
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 11:10:23AM +0800, Fung wrote:
> Do anyone know what is the diff. between SSLv2_method and
> SSLv23_method?? Once I used SSLv23_method to create SSL_CTX for my
> client program, handshake failure returned when connected to some
> web server. When I ch
