ent: 19 May 2009 12:50
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Subject: (SCL: 1) Re: SSL_CTX_load_verify_locations was SSL_shutdown
> never returns 1
>
> Ummm... could you resend this, in something intelligible? :)
>
> -Kyle H
>
> On T
t;leak".
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-
> us...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Kyle Hamilton
> Sent: 19 May 2009 12:49
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Subject: Re: SSL_shutdown never returns 1
>
> When you get an
Ummm... could you resend this, in something intelligible? :)
-Kyle H
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Andy Murphy wrote:
> V2VsbCBJJ3ZlIGZvdW5kIG91dCB3aGF0IGlzIHRha2luZyB0aGUgbWVtb3J5IGFuZCBpdCdzIHRo
> aXM6IFNTTF9DVFhfbG9hZF92ZXJpZnlfbG9jYXRpb25zLiAgSSdtIGNhbGxpbmcgaXQgZm9yIGVh
> Y2ggU1NMX0NUWCw
; Thanks for any help you can give.
>
> Andy
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-
>> us...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Kyle Hamilton
>> Sent: 14 May 2009 18:10
>> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
>
could be the
> cause.
>
> A bit more history is that as always the original developer has long
> flown the nest so I'm learning the library here.
>
> Thanks for any help you can give.
>
> Andy
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: own
ny help you can give.
Andy
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-
> us...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Kyle Hamilton
> Sent: 14 May 2009 18:10
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Subject: Re: SSL_shutdown never returns 1
>
> I
If you expect no more data from the client, you can simply destroy the
SSL context at the point you first call it (even if it returns 0). It
will only return 1 if it has received the peer's close_notify, and
it's possible that those peers failed to send it. (Do you get an
SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL with E
Hi, we are trying to track down a memory leak that occurs when we run
secure comms using the OpenSSL library. Now we've had this before where
we thought it was the library but I tracked it down to us not using the
word virtual on our base class' destructor, so I'm not about to start
blaming OpenSS
