Jason Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Yeah - but that can be good enough. For instance we are part of a
>multi-national company. If all our Internet mail gateways supported TLS,
>then we could use the Internet to transmit our Email instead of expensive
>WANs...
What you really want to do, then,
On Wed, Oct 20, 1999 at 09:40:02AM +0100, Pinca George wrote:
> Anyway SSL is a point-to-point protocol and there are not many mail
> servers supporting SSL out there. So , with SSL your messages will be
> encrypted just till the first server.
Yeah - but that can be good enough. For instance we
needs to send encrypted mail they
should use S/MIME or PGP.
George
- Original Message -
From:
Steve
Sampson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 1999 10:06
PM
Subject: Re: SSL for sendmail
The federal pens are pretty nice. With a 5 year sentenc
The federal pens are pretty nice. With a 5 year sentence, it
would be like a sabatical, and you could write a great book in
that time. They have computers in the library (SSL capable) :-)
Think of the positives. Right now people like Liddy are worth
more after prison than before. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi all, I'm looking for an SSL extention for sendmail.
If such a thing exists can anyone leed me to that
before I start writing it myself wich would involve
learning sockets and SSLeay so before start inventing
the weel i'd like to knowif anyone else allready h
