Re: Regarding Client Finished message

2007-09-13 Thread Suchindra Chandrahas
Thanks Merek. I have compiled a somewhat working version of it. Hope to complete by tomorrow Thanks for Matrix SSL Thanks and Regards, Suchindra Chandrahas Marek Marcola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, > Thanks Merek. Will start working on this. Any docs that might have > implementations of t

Re: Regarding Client Finished message

2007-09-13 Thread Marek Marcola
Hello, > Thanks Merek. Will start working on this. Any docs that might have > implementations of this in some code snippet forms, because i am not > so well versed with MD5/Crypto libraries ? If you want to look at very clear and well commented implementation of SSL you may look at MatrixSSL Best

Re: Regarding Client Finished message

2007-09-13 Thread Suchindra Chandrahas
Thanks Merek. Will start working on this. Any docs that might have implementations of this in some code snippet forms, because i am not so well versed with MD5/Crypto libraries ? Thanks and Regards, Suchindra Chandrahas Marek Marcola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, > I have been

Re: Regarding Client Finished message

2007-09-13 Thread Marek Marcola
Hello, > I have been able to complete handshake till > client_finished message. However, i am a little confused in > client_finished message. Here is what i understand: > > client finished message as given in RFC draft, is: > > > > enum { client(0x434C4E54), server(0x53525652) } Se

Regarding Client Finished message

2007-09-13 Thread Suchindra Chandrahas
Hi All, I have been able to complete handshake till client_finished message. However, i am a little confused in client_finished message. Here is what i understand: client finished message as given in RFC draft, is: enum { client(0x434C4E54), server(0x53525652) } Sender; st