Hi,
On 10/05/19 02:29, ramakrushna mishra wrote:
Hi,
Could anyone please help me wth it.
Following are sslc speed results for SHA1.
[...]
OpenSSL 1.1.0e 16 Feb 2017
type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes
8192 bytes 16384 bytes
sha1 90515.06k 301813
On 10/05/19 03:16, ramakrushna mishra wrote:
Hi ,
The results on a AIX machine looks more bad If I am interpreting them
correctly.
openssl 1.1.0e :
The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192
bytes 16384 by
Hi ,
I have installed openssl from scratch and there I am not observing any
degradation. But I built it with in my project, there I observe the
degradation. The Configure file remains same , but still in my project I
can see a difference that "dynamic-engine" is present in enabled feature
list.
Hi ,
The results on a AIX machine looks more bad If I am interpreting them
correctly.
openssl 1.1.0e :
The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
type 16 bytes 64 bytes256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192
bytes 16384 bytes
sha1 65019.16k 151552.49k 266
Hi,
Could anyone please help me wth it.
Following are sslc speed results for SHA1.
sslc speed sha1
Doing sha1 for 3s on 16 size blocks: 16858430 sha1's in 2.98s
Doing sha1 for 3s on 64 size blocks: 14147528 sha1's in 3.00s
Doing sha1 for 3s on 256 size blocks: 6436755 sha1's in 2.99s
Doing sha1
> Could you please look into the program and let me know if anything I am
> doing wrong ?
> Or else What could be the issue ?
Sorry, no not me. Maybe someone else on the list has ideas.
Hi ,
I can observe slowness with standalone c programs. Attached are the sample
c programs.
If I run them with openssl 1.1.1 and 1.1.0e version on Linux system (Linux
2.6.32-504.el6.x86_64 x86_64
). then I can see the difference. If I increase the number of loop in the
program, then the slowness
So now you know where to start looking, I guess. You might also change your
test program so that it calls the functions multiple times, to “smooth out” the
overhead.
Hi,
Thank you for the response.
If we compare in quantify attached is the results.
Thanks and Regards,
Ram Krushna
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 8:28 PM Salz, Rich wrote:
> I would start with doing profiling on old and new versions to see where
> the slowdown is.
>
Differences between:
program rx (pi
I would start with doing profiling on old and new versions to see where the
slowdown is.
Hi,
When we use following set of SSL methods ( openssl 1.1.1) for SHA1-digest,
we are witnessing slowness compared to openssl 1.1.0e.
EVP_get_digestbyname
EVP_MD_CTX_new
EVP_DigestInit_ex
EVP_DigestUpdate
EVP_DigestFinal_ex
Could anyone please guide me about how to debug this issue.
Thanks an
11 matches
Mail list logo