On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Matt Caswell wrote:
> On 15 May 2014 10:39, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Tom stone wrote:
>>>
>>> Am I missing something or is there a bug in the openssl gcm implementation?
>>
>> If its any consolation, your question triggered a doc
On 15 May 2014 10:39, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Tom stone wrote:
>>
>> Am I missing something or is there a bug in the openssl gcm implementation?
>
> If its any consolation, your question triggered a documentation patch.
> Matt Caswell recently committed it. "Add
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Tom stone wrote:
> Using openssl-1.0.1g command line for simple file encryption/decryption,
> when I issue the commands
>
> openssl enc -aes-256-cbc -k secret -in file.txt -out file.ssl
> openssl enc -d -aes-256-cbc -k secret -in file.ssl
>
> The contents of file.
On Tue, May 13, 2014, Tom stone wrote:
> Jeremy,
>
> Thank you for your quick response. I am definitely interested in
> additional details. If you know who I should contact that would be great.
> Do you know whether this only effects simple file encryption or is it
> general to the gcm mode, ie
Hopefully someone else on the list can speak to your further questions….
--Jeremy
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Tom stone wrote:
> Jeremy,
>
> Thank you for your quick response. I am definitely interested in
> additional details. If you know who I should contact that would be great.
> Do
Jeremy,
Thank you for your quick response. I am definitely interested in
additional details. If you know who I should contact that would be great.
Do you know whether this only effects simple file encryption or is it
general to the gcm mode, ie. would it effect tcp/ip traffic?
Thanks
On Tue,
I had exactly this issue a few days ago. Turns out that there's a bug in
setting up the GCM cipher, so the enc part is not working correctly for
GCM. More than that, someone else will have to elaborate if you are
interested.
--Jeremy
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Tom stone wrote:
> Using
