On Fri, Nov 21, 2003, Joseph Bruni wrote:
>
> On a related note, how does this work for the other types of general
> names (e.g. DNS, IP)? Looking through the v3_alt.c I don't see any code
> that moves or copies DNS or IP values from the DN into alternative
> names extensions. Do all these oth
Do I ever feel like an idiot. I was building a minimalist configuration
file for you and, lo, it started working -- on all versions of 0.9.7
that I have been experimenting with (a,b,c).
After a little more experimentation to figure out why this suddenly
started working, I uncovered my mistake:
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2003, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003, Joseph Bruni wrote:
> >
> > > I've been poking around in the v3_alt.c file to try to determine why the email
> > > address is not getting copied or moved into the extens
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2003, Joseph Bruni wrote:
>
> > I've been poking around in the v3_alt.c file to try to determine why the email
> > address is not getting copied or moved into the extension. After sprinkling in a
> > few debug statements, it look
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003, Joseph Bruni wrote:
> I've been poking around in the v3_alt.c file to try to determine why the email
> address is not getting copied or moved into the extension. After sprinkling in a few
> debug statements, it looks like the copy_email() function is broken and never enters
I had tried that as well with no success, which is what is leading me to believe this
is a bug.
In the CSR, I have the emailAddress field set in the DN. In the CA section of the
configuration file, I have subjectAltName=email:move in the section referenced from
the x509_extensions option:
x509
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 20 Nov 2003 19:56:23 -0700, Joseph Bruni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
jbruni> I've been trying to get the "subjectAltName=email:move" directive to
jbruni> work in the "ca" command with no luck, so I think this might be a bug.
jbruni>
jbruni> It seems that the
