> I am not familar with ASN.1, or any of the specifice of which the rsa
> key is generated. It just seemed as it should not be so.
> What is the ASN.1 encoding, and how is it used?
The vast majority of file formats begin with a header that is similar or
identical for files that contain different
Hello,
> I am not familar with ASN.1, or any of the specifice of which the rsa
> key is generated. It just seemed as it should not be so.
> What is the ASN.1 encoding, and how is it used?
RSA private key is a set of big numbers: n,d,e,p,q,dmp1,dmq1,iqmp.
(this is not one number).
When this numbers
I am not familar with ASN.1, or any of the specifice of which the rsa
key is generated. It just seemed as it should not be so.
What is the ASN.1 encoding, and how is it used?
On 8/9/07, Marek Marcola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> > Looks like this may be the issue, a flaw in the key gener
Hello,
> Looks like this may be the issue, a flaw in the key generation algorithm.
> https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/724968
Probably not, this is flow in Montgomery multiplication which is used
in modular exponentation. Of course modular exponentation is used
in key generation process in p,q prime
Looks like this may be the issue, a flaw in the key generation algorithm.
https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/724968
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List
These are the first few bytes of the key. Here they are from 10 keys
generated with the command: openssl genrsa -rand /dev/urandom
MIIBOwIBAAJ
MIIBOgIBAAJ
MIIBPAIBAAJ
MIIBPQIBAAJ
MIIBOgIBAAJ
MIIBOgIBAAJ
MIIBOQIBAAJ
MIIBOwIBAAJ
MIIBOwIBAAJ
MIIBOwIBAAJ
On 8/9/07, jimmy bahuleyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello,
> I have noticed when generating rsa keys that the first 10 digits or
> so are identical or nearly identical. Is this normal or is something
> wrong? Does this issue occur for anyone else?
> The version of openssl I am using is openssl-0.9.8b-8.3.fc6 and I am
> using -rand /dev/urandom to
Patrick Parsons wrote:
> Hello,
> I have noticed when generating rsa keys that the first 10 digits or so are
> identical or nearly identical. Is this normal or is something wrong? Does
> this issue occur for anyone else?
could you post the bytes that you're referring to. (my guess is that
it's t