Re: errors in DTLS implementation in openssl0.9.8a

2006-09-14 Thread Rob Dugal
rpretation of this is that the version number is { 254,255 }. However, openssl 0.9.8 appear to interpret this as saying the version is { 01, 00 } Can the authors please clarify? thanks, Rob > List:       openssl-users > Subject:    Re: errors in DTLS implementation in openssl0.9.8a > From:  

Re: errors in DTLS implementation in openssl0.9.8a

2005-12-13 Thread Prashant Kumar
16 01 00 for a DTLS handshake is the right code   16, Content type, and it is a handshake   DTLS version is 01 00   Thanks, Prashant.Eduardo Pérez Ureta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Maybe you can try:http://www.aet.tu-cottbus.de/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=1245http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu

Re: errors in DTLS implementation in openssl0.9.8a

2005-12-12 Thread Eduardo Pérez Ureta
Maybe you can try: http://www.aet.tu-cottbus.de/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=1245 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=335703 This patch may fix the segmentation fault that I also confirm on openssl-0.9.8a running on linux-2.6.14/686 Some developer should review that patch. (I'll try it l