Re: certool v.s. openssl - broken/mis-interpreted sha256 cert issue.

2012-11-14 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On 14 nov. 2012, at 19:58, "Dr. Stephen Henson" wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > >> Folks, >> >> Have a CA (created by certtool, validates in openssl as self signed just >> fine) and a server cert (created with certtool, signed with certool) which >> des NOT vali

Re: [openssl-users] Re: certool v.s. openssl - broken/mis-interpreted sha256 cert issue.

2012-11-14 Thread Erwann Abalea
In addition to Mr Henson answer, your CA certificate doesn't have any keyUsage extension, depending on the toolkit it may not be considered a valid CA. Your countryName AVA is wrong, too. It must be only 2 characters long, "NL" in your case. -- Erwann ABALEA - yuppiexpédidétritus: cadavres

Re: certool v.s. openssl - broken/mis-interpreted sha256 cert issue.

2012-11-14 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > Folks, > > Have a CA (created by certtool, validates in openssl as self signed just > fine) and a server cert (created with certtool, signed with certool) which > des NOT validate in openssl. > > However the signature (when extracted with op

Re: certool v.s. openssl - broken/mis-interpreted sha256 cert issue.

2012-11-14 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On 14 nov. 2012, at 18:42, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > Have a CA (created by certtool, validates in openssl as self signed just > fine) and a server cert (created with certtool, signed with certool) which > des NOT validate in openssl. > > However the signature (when extracted with openssl