very much,
>
> Diego Gonzalez
> -
> -
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tomas Mraz
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2022 1:22 AM
> To: GonzalezVillalobos, Diego ;
> openssl-users@openssl.org
> Subject: Re: Updating RSA public key generation and signature
>
Subject: Re: Updating RSA public key generation and signature verification from
1.1.1 to 3.0
Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution
when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
Hi,
unfortunately I do not see anything wrong with the code. Does
> From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Tomas
> Mraz
> Sent: Friday, 30 September, 2022 00:22
>
> unfortunately I do not see anything wrong with the code. Does the
> EVP_DigestVerifyFinal return 0 or negative value? I do not think this
> is a bug in OpenSSL as this API is thoroughly tested and it is h
ret == 0) {
> cout << "EC Verify digest fails" << endl;
> break;
> } else if (ret < 0) {
> printf("Failed Final Verify
> %s\n",ERR_error_string(ERR_get_error(),NULL));
&
that, it is the
same. Could it be a bug?
Thank you,
Diego Gonzalez
--------------
-Original Message-
From: Tomas Mraz
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 1:12 AM
To: Gon
Hi,
comments below.
On Wed, 2022-09-28 at 22:12 +, GonzalezVillalobos, Diego wrote:
> [AMD Official Use Only - General]
>
> Hello Tomas,
>
> I generated the key as you suggested, and I am no longer getting an
> error message! Thank you for that. Here is how I'm generating the key
> now:
>
break;
}
found_match = true;
cout << "SEV EC verification Succesful" << endl;
Could it be because I'm creating a ECDSA SIG object and then turning it into a
der format to verify? Again, suggestions would
break;
> }
>
> if (EVP_DigestVerifyUpdate(verify_md_ctx, child_cert,
> pub_key_offset) <= 0){ // Calls SHA256_UPDATE
> cout << "updating digest fails" << endl;
> break;
> }
>
> int ret = EVP_DigestVerifyFinal(verify_md_ctx,
> signature, sig_len);
>
cesful" << endl;
My current output when I reach EVP_DigestVerifyFinal is showing this error:
Failed Final Verify error:03000095:digital envelope routines::no operation set
I have been playing around with it for a while, but I am stuck at this point.
Any advice would be appreciated.
Than
On Thu, 2022-09-08 at 16:10 +, GonzalezVillalobos, Diego via
openssl-users wrote:
> [AMD Official Use Only - General]
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am currently working on updating a signature verification function
> in C++ and I am a bit stuck. I am trying to replace the deprecated
> 1.1.1 func
10 matches
Mail list logo
