On Mon, Feb 10, 2003, Chandrasekhar R S wrote:
> It seems I have not explained myself ably.
>
> I completly understand that Private Keys should and would never be sent
> across.
>
> But assume that you are going through a proxy using SSL. And the proxy has
> no capability to verify the certs.
ween proxy and the backend server.
>
> thanks to all of you,
> rsr.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Helm
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 1:55 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Tunne
d the backend server.
thanks to all of you,
rsr.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Helm
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 1:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tunneling Client Certs
> > I have the followi
> > I have the following scenario -
> >
> > Client Cert -- Tunnel Server - Tunnel Client -- Backend server.
> >
> > The requirement is to pass the Client Cert to the Backend server.
> If you could do that then anyone who had access to a certificate
> (for example the recipent of signed emai
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003, Chandrasekhar R S wrote:
> I have posted a similar message earlier. Hoping to convey self better and
> get some help this time around.
>
> I have the following scenario -
>
> Client Cert -- Tunnel Server - Tunnel Client -- Backend server.
>
> The requirement is to pa
* Chandrasekhar R S ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> My question is, "Is it possible to just give a Cert for an SSL connection
> (like giving SSL_use_certificate()) without a corresponding
> SSL_use_PrivateKey(..) call made, and expect SSL to somehow generate its own
> keys but take our certificate?
