RE: The no-stdio and NO_FP_API options

2014-09-06 Thread Salz, Rich
It would be easiest if you attached them to RT 2279. If that’s a hassle, post them or email me. -- Principal Security Engineer Akamai Technologies, Cambridge MA IM: rs...@jabber.me Twitter: RichSalz

Re: The no-stdio and NO_FP_API options

2014-09-06 Thread Jens Maus
That sounds good. How do you want my changes to be submitted? Via an attached diff here or by private mail? regards, Jens -- Jens Maus, Dresden/Germany http://jens-maus.de/ (Please note a real name change effective since 5.9.2013. Previous name: Jens Langner) > Am 05.09.2014 um 13:49 schrieb "

RE: The no-stdio and NO_FP_API options

2014-09-05 Thread Salz, Rich
Thanks. There is no big rush, knowing you're working on it, and this is for after 1.0.2. Perhaps by January/Feb? -- Principal Security Engineer Akamai Technologies, Cambridge MA IM: rs...@jabber.me Twitter: RichSalz __ Open

Re: The no-stdio and NO_FP_API options

2014-09-04 Thread Jens Maus
Am 04.09.2014 um 17:56 schrieb Salz, Rich : >> So please tell me *exactly* what you require to get the NO_FP_API support >> into a state that it is still acceptable for you. And please tell how and on >> which >> platform I can reproduce the problems you are seeing. > > Any Linux platform. "./c

RE: The no-stdio and NO_FP_API options

2014-09-04 Thread Salz, Rich
> So please tell me *exactly* what you require to get the NO_FP_API support > into a state that it is still acceptable for you. And please tell how and on > which > platform I can reproduce the problems you are seeing. Any Linux platform. "./config no-stdio -DNO_FP_API" should build clean. --

Re: The no-stdio and NO_FP_API options

2014-09-04 Thread Kyle Hamilton
Well, why don't you at least provide a link to AmiSSL, so it can be examined? You don't have to handhold rsalz in upstreaming a patch from downstream. (You're treating this like you're the boss -- but if you want NO_FP_API and no-stdio to stick around in the upstream, you need to recognize that

Re: The no-stdio and NO_FP_API options

2014-09-04 Thread Jens Maus
Well, I would be happy to assist you in keeping NO_FP_API alive and supply you with adequate diffs and resources. However, I would first need to know what exactly is not working for you and where and on which platform exactly it breaks for you because actually it is *working* for us. Please not

RE: The no-stdio and NO_FP_API options

2014-09-03 Thread Salz, Rich
I am sorry that I was not clear. I am saying that if there are people who depend and want no-stdio and NO_FP_API to be kept in the OpenSSL source, then they need to feed their patches, just to make those things work, back to OpenSSL. My mind is not made up. I am asking for people who want us t

Re: The no-stdio and NO_FP_API options

2014-09-03 Thread Michael Sierchio
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Jens Maus wrote: > Am 03.09.2014 um 21:33 schrieb Salz, Rich : > > >> +1 for keeping the features (I use AmiSSL ;) ) > > > > It doesn’t build. Unless that is addressed, it is highly likely that I > will remove it from the tree after 1.0.2 > > Well, then why are yo

Re: The no-stdio and NO_FP_API options

2014-09-03 Thread Jens Maus
Am 03.09.2014 um 21:33 schrieb Salz, Rich : >> +1 for keeping the features (I use AmiSSL ;) ) > > It doesn’t build. Unless that is addressed, it is highly likely that I will > remove it from the tree after 1.0.2 Well, then why are you asking for opinions in first place if your decision is alr

RE: The no-stdio and NO_FP_API options

2014-09-03 Thread Salz, Rich
> +1 for keeping the features (I use AmiSSL ;) ) It doesn’t build. Unless that is addressed, it is highly likely that I will remove it from the tree after 1.0.2 -- Principal Security Engineer Akamai Technologies, Cambridge MA IM: rs...@jabber.me Twitter: RichSalz

Re: The no-stdio and NO_FP_API options

2014-09-03 Thread Alan Buxey
+1 for keeping the features (I use AmiSSL ;) ) alan -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

RE: The no-stdio and NO_FP_API options

2014-09-03 Thread Salz, Rich
What config flags to you use? What changes have you made? It doesn't build for me. -- Principal Security Engineer Akamai Technologies, Cambridge MA IM: rs...@jabber.me Twitter: RichSalz __ OpenSSL Project

Re: The no-stdio and NO_FP_API options

2014-09-03 Thread Jens Maus
We are using these options for an AmigaOS-based port of OpenSSL (which we call AmiSSL) which can be found here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/amissl/ In fact, we use these two options because file pointers are substantially handled differently on AmigaOS and we use no-stdio because we build A