Re: Seg fault in BN_mod_exp

2003-12-02 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2003, Ashutosh Jaiswal wrote: > > > > > Pardon my rather limited knowledge about debugging with gdb, but does > > this mean that there's some problem with glibc: > > > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > > 0x

Re: Seg fault in BN_mod_exp

2003-12-02 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003, Ashutosh Jaiswal wrote: > > Pardon my rather limited knowledge about debugging with gdb, but does > this mean that there's some problem with glibc: > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > 0x45964169 in free () from /lib/libc.so.6 > (gdb) i sym 0x45964169

Re: Seg fault in BN_mod_exp

2003-12-02 Thread Ashutosh Jaiswal
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: On Tue, Dec 02, 2003, Ashutosh Jaiswal wrote: I might be doing something really stupid, but I checked my code again and don't seem to be able to find it. I'm trying to use the function BN_mod_exp for values which are earlier generated by other BN_* funct

Re: Seg fault in BN_mod_exp

2003-12-02 Thread Ashutosh Jaiswal
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: On Tue, Dec 02, 2003, Ashutosh Jaiswal wrote: I might be doing something really stupid, but I checked my code again and don't seem to be able to find it. I'm trying to use the function BN_mod_exp for values which are earlier generated by other BN_* funct

Re: Seg fault in BN_mod_exp

2003-12-02 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003, Ashutosh Jaiswal wrote: > I might be doing something really stupid, but I checked my code again > and don't seem to be able to find it. I'm trying to use the function > BN_mod_exp for values which are earlier generated by other BN_* > functions. Here's the code: > > e = BN_