> | > Does anyone know of a program like sslwrap or stunnel
> that can fallback to
> | > a non-ssl connection if the SSL handshake fails?
> | >
> | > example..
> | >
> | > connect to mail port 25, client supports ssl, connection is sll
> | > other client connects to port 25, dosen;t support S
Will,
> >In the current version of stunnel this behavior is 'by design'
against
> >RFC. Stunnel is made to enforce encryption.
> >Well... It think it could be changed. What do you think?
> Why would you want to?
To meet RFC requirements?
> The whole purpose of setting up an encrypted link
>
+- On Thu, 02 Sep 1999 23:38:01 +0800, Ng Pheng Siong writes:
| On Wed, Sep 01, 1999 at 01:45:00PM -0700, Wil Boucher wrote:
| > Does anyone know of a program like sslwrap or stunnel that can fallback to
| > a non-ssl connection if the SSL handshake fails?
| >
| > example..
| >
| > connect
