Re: Reducing SSL3 Buffer Requirements

2005-09-23 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005, Martin Del Vecchio wrote: > It works as expected. I'm wondering about the "1024 +" values for > compressed and encrypted length. A previous responder said that > compression is "universally unimplemented". > I know of several people using compression with OpenSSL. Indeed

RE: Reducing SSL3 Buffer Requirements

2005-09-23 Thread Martin Del Vecchio
2005 4:08 PMTo: openssl-users@openssl.orgSubject: Re: Reducing SSL3 Buffer Requirements On 9/22/05, Martin Del Vecchio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On the transmit side, OpenSSL currently has the ability to sendarbitrarily large messages,one 16K record at a time.  Is there any harm in

RE: Reducing SSL3 Buffer Requirements

2005-09-22 Thread PeerSec Networks Inc.
] On Behalf Of Martin Del Vecchio Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 12:22 PM To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: RE: Reducing SSL3 Buffer Requirements -Original Message- The cause is the maximum record size in the specifications, any compliant client or server might send a record of maxi

Re: Reducing SSL3 Buffer Requirements

2005-09-22 Thread Marton Anka
On 9/22/05, Martin Del Vecchio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On the transmit side, OpenSSL currently has the ability to sendarbitrarily large messages,one 16K record at a time.  Is there any harm in me deciding to sendlarge messages one 4K recordat a time? This should be perfectly fine. Implementing

RE: Reducing SSL3 Buffer Requirements

2005-09-22 Thread Martin Del Vecchio
-Original Message- The cause is the maximum record size in the specifications, any compliant client or server might send a record of maximum size which would then reach the requirements stated. If the maximum record length is used an implementation can't do much about that because it has t

Re: Reducing SSL3 Buffer Requirements

2005-09-22 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005, Marton Anka wrote: > On 9/13/05, Martin Del Vecchio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > My application needs to support a large number (thousands) of > > connections, so this memory requirement is huge. And my application > > doesn't need to send 16K messages; 4K would be more

Re: Reducing SSL3 Buffer Requirements

2005-09-22 Thread Marton Anka
On 9/13/05, Martin Del Vecchio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My application needs to support a large number (thousands) ofconnections, so this memory requirement is huge.  And my applicationdoesn't need to send 16K messages; 4K would be more than enough. I wouldn't mind being able to reduce the size